Richard A. Passwater PhD – Healthy.net https://healthy.net Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:08:13 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://healthy.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/cropped-Healthy_Logo_Solid_Angle-1-1-32x32.png Richard A. Passwater PhD – Healthy.net https://healthy.net 32 32 165319808 Sun-damage, Skin and Pycnogenol https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/sun-damage-skin-and-pycnogenol/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sun-damage-skin-and-pycnogenol Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/sun-damage-skin-and-pycnogenol/ When my first column on Pycnogenol appeared, and especially
after my booklet on the nutrient was published, I received many
letters from readers wishing to know more about this important
nutritional supplement. So I set about visiting several researchers
around the world to learn more about Pycnogenol and the latest
research on its health benefits.


One of my most enjoyable visits was with Professor Antti Arstila of the
University of Jyvaeskylae in central Finland during October, 1993. It amused
me that I had to travel almost halfway around the world to meet Professor
Arstila when after all, since 1971, he occasionally is in my back yard as
an Associate Professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine,
but yet our paths did not cross while he was in the U. S.



Prior to that, he was an Associate Professor at Duke University from
1969 – 1971. Professor Arstila also lectured on Pycnogenol in the U. S.
in 1992, but again, our schedules did not match. So, in Finland, a few miles
from the Arctic Circle, we finally meet. It was well worth the trip.



Professor Antti Holevi Arstila, M.D. is a cell biologist, toxicologist,
pathologist and antioxidant expert. He is the Chairman of the Department
of Cell Biology at the University of Jyvaeskylae in Jyvaeskylae, Finland.
Professor Arstila has authored 15 scientific and medical textbooks, in addition
to six books for laymen on health and disease. He has also contributed to
more than 200 scientific publications, congress abstracts and textbooks
on subjects that include electron microscopy, neuroscience, cell injury,
lipid peroxidation, free radicals and antioxidants.



In addition to discussing Dr. Arstila’s research with him, I was privileged
to attend the presentation and defense of one of Professor Arstila’s doctoral
candidates’ dissertation. Finnish Universities have a strong reputation
for excellence. They avoid becoming isolated or drifting away from the mainstream
which could happen due to their relative geographical isolation. Doctoral
candidates not only have to defend their research dissertation before their
own faculty, but interrogators from foreign universities to “cross
examine” them in a public forum.



Doctoral candidate Zhao Guochang had completed years of research on how
Pycnogenol protected against ultraviolet radiation-induced oxidative stress
in skin. This is a topic of considerable interest as we realize that our
partial protection provided by the ozone layer is diminishing. Thus, in
addition to the normal contingent of professors in full academic regalia
and family, there were several members of the television and print media
in the beautiful and historic University auditorium. Now Dr. Zhao Guochang
is continuing his research at the Medical College of Wisconsin.



Passwater: Professor Arstila, you have a great background to properly evaluate
the role of nutrients in our health, not only in regards to their beneficial
effects, but also their safety. How did your interest lead you into all
of these fields of specialty?



Arstila: When I was at Duke University, we carried out many studies on iron
toxicity which was a great problem in Central Africa because of their use
of iron pans. Then we realized that iron toxicity is not only a problem
of Central Africa, but throughout the Western World as well, especially
with men. I became particularly interested in possible toxicity from nutrient
excesses, and I became interested in antioxidants because they are protective
against many toxicities, especially from pro-oxidants.



Passwater: Your department’s research on the protection provided by pycnogenol
against sun damage has received a lot of attention in both the scientific
and general press. What led you to this area of research?



Arstila: There has been great scientific concern about the thinning of our
planet’s protective ozone layer and the possibility that our skin cancer
rate will dramatically increase. In addition, these UV-B rays are thought
to possibly be a factor in the decline in populations of frogs, toads and
salamanders. This radiation reduces the hatching rates from their eggs because
the amphibians can’t repair UV damage to their DNA. Like the canary in the
coal mine, this is a signal that something is wrong.



Passwater: Tell us a little about the background of the UV-B problem.



Arstila: Several scientists have been monitoring the ozone levels in the
stratosphere and the UV-B levels reaching the ground for several years.
The ozone level fluctuates with the season and the year, but there has been
a trend of a five-to-ten percent annual decrease. Toronto scientists James
Kerr and C. T. McElroy have noted that the amount of UV at ground level
in Toronto has increased each year by 35% in winter and seven percent in
summer.



UV radiation can produce a variety of dermatological effects in humans including
erythema, photosensitivity, immunological alterations, photoaging, and carcinogenesis.
UV-B is considered to be the portion of the UV spectrum primarily responsible
for the deleterious effect of solar UV radiation.



Passwater: How does UV radiation damage skin?



Arstila: One possible mechanism underlying UV-B radiation-induced cell damage
is oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is a cellular situation characterized
by an elevation in the steady-state concentration of free radicals and other
reactive oxygen species. Oxidative stress occurs if the balance between
the cellular antioxidant defenses and the mechanisms triggering oxidative
conditions is impaired. Zhao Guochang and I thought that since skin fibroblasts
(cells found in growing tissue) have important functions in skin dermis,
that it would be important to study the effects of UV-B on skin fibroblasts
and then find ways of protecting the fibroblasts.



Passwater: Does Pycnogenol protect skin from UV damage?



Arstila: Yes. Pycnogenol reduced UV-B radiation-induced cytotoxicity and
lipid peroxidation in a manner proportional to the amount of Pycnogenol
present. Our studies indicate that UV-B radiation induces oxidative stress
in cultured human skin fibroblasts, that UV-B induced oxidative injuries
are not reduced by dl-alpha-tocopherol but are reduced by Pycnogenol, and
that Pycnogenol scavenges superoxide radicals in vitro.



Passwater: Isn’t Pycnogenol a good nutrient for skin anyway because it facilitates
the production of the skin protein collagen?



Arstila: Yes, through its protection and sparing of vitamin C, it does aid
collagen development. But, perhaps of greater interest, is that it improves
the beneficial cross-linking between the amino acids of the fibers that
give skin its flexibility and strength, while preventing the undesirable
cross-linking between the amino acids that ages skin like leather. The nutrients
of Pycnogenol have a great affinity for skin proteins and that helps protect them against free radicals and other reactive oxygen species.

Passwater: You mentioned that vitamin E didn’t provide the protection against the UV-B, were other antioxidants studied as well, and, if so, how did they compare to the protective effects of Pycnogenol?


Arstila: No. We were trying to test nutrients that had a good chance of working. Vitamin E had shown promise from in vitro studies, but it had failed human studies. We wanted to look at both vitamin E and Pycnogenol. Pycnogenol was protective whereas vitamin E was not.

Passwater: What distinguishes Pycnogenol from other antioxidants?

Arstila: Each antioxidant has a unique antioxidant profile. There are many types of free radicals and other reactive oxygen species that harm the body, and antioxidants vary in their ability to quench these various reactive oxygen species. In addition, some antioxidants are water-soluble and others are fat-soluble. Their solubility determines where they can travel and what they will be able to protect. Pycnogenol is very water-soluble and is more protective against some reactive oxygen species such as measured by the TBARS test than either vitamin C or vitamin E, and is more protective against at least one stable free radical than vitamin E and more protective against superoxide than vitamin C. There are other reactive oxygen species in which vitamins C and E are more protective than Pycnogenol. The best approach is to utilize many different antioxidants — vitamins C and E, selenium, carotenoids, and Pycnogenol as they tend to be synergistic.

What is of particular interest about the nutrients of Pycnogenol is their affinity for the skin proteins such as collagen and elastin. This is why we chose Pycnogenol for our UV-B study.

Passwater: What distinguishes Pycnogenol from other bioflavonoids?

Arstila: Pycnogenol is a water-extracted mixture of monomers, dimers, and oligomers, plus other polyphenols and organic acid “building-blocks.” Therefore all of the nutrients so extracted are water soluble, whereas the bioflavonoid rutin is not very water- soluble. In addition, the nutrients in Pycnogenol are very bioavailable, whereas rutin is not very bioavailable. The oligomers present in Pycnogenol are unique and have unique antioxidant profiles.

Passwater: You have written books on Toxicology, what can you tell us about the safety of Pycnogenol?

Arstila: Yes, I have written many research papers on toxicology and there is no question that Pycnogenol is a non-toxic natural product. Pycnogenol was well tested before it was introduced in Europe originally as “Pycnoforton,” and it has been well tested throughout the years to keep up with the increased sophistication of toxicological tests. As an example, Pycnogenol has been subjected to tests for mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenic (birth defects), and acute and gross toxicities in several species of animals. Many clinical studies have been made and no adverse effects have been reported. Pycnogenol has received extensive toxicity testing in comparison to food supplements such as vitamins because of its widespread use by physicians in Europe.

Passwater: Where are your current research interests?


Arstila: I am now concentrating on the free-radical damage of our genetic material DNA. It may be that DNA damage by free radicals is by far more important than other forms of free radical damage. The DNA damage may be important factors in cancer and aging.

Passwater: Thank you Professor Arstila.

All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted to � Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).

]]>
23572
Vitamins, Immune Response and Safety https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/vitamins-immune-response-and-safety/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=vitamins-immune-response-and-safety Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/vitamins-immune-response-and-safety/ I keep a very close watch on vitamin safety issues and I occasionally
write and lecture on the subject of vitamin safety. Readers may remember
my ten-part series on the safety of vitamins published in this column in
from October 1985 through December 1986. I have discussed vitamin safety
in my books and have often included chapters devoted entirely to this important
subject. I have also spoken on vitamin safety at national and regional NNFA
meetings. However, I never consider my research complete until I double-check
with Dr. Adrianne Bendich. Through the years, I have found her to be my
most knowledgeable and up-to-date reference resource on the subject.



Dr. Adrianne Bendich is Clinical Research Scientist in Human Nutrition Research at Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. She is an Associate editor of the Journal
of Nutritional Immunity
and was on the editorial board of the Journal
of Nutrition
. She is the coeditor of three books entitled “Micronutrients
and Immune Functions,” “Vitamin Intake and Health,” and “Micronutrients
in Health and in Disease Prevention,.” as well as two Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences and chapters in other technical books. Dr.
Bendich has chaired or co-chaired several scientific conferences and she
has published more than 75 scientific articles on vitamin biochemistry and
safety.



One of my most vivid memories of Dr. Bendich stems from the Dykstra hearing
held at the National Institutes of Health in 1991. One of the FDA committee
members was making a mountain out of a molehill which brought Dr. Bendich
to the microphone to tell the FDA that they had more important health questions
to address instead of being on a witch hunt about supplements. She suggested
that they worry more about health problems such as smoking, excess alcohol
consumption and over-the-counter drugs such as aspirin and acetaminophen.



Dr. Bendich has done much to further the health of people of all ages, and
she is a protector of the scientific truth. Perhaps, this is why she won
the Roche Award in 1992. Her travel schedule is heavy because she attends
many scientific conferences, but recently I was able to chat with her at
length concerning the latest safety issues and vitamin safety and public
health issues..



Passwater: Dr. Bendich, why did you become interested in nutrition,
and especially vitamins and immune function? Why did you become interested
in vitamin safety, especially vitamin A and beta-carotene?



Bendich: My first experiments to examine the immunological effects
of nutrients involved vitamin E. Dr. Lawrence Machlin asked me to collaborate
on a study of the overall effects of vitamin E deficiency in a laboratory
animal model. Dr. Myron Brin, the head of Roche’s vitamin research at
the time, in the early 1980’s, was convinced that essential micronutrients,
such as vitamin E and vitamin C, were critical for mounting optimal immune
responses.



The objective of our first experiments was to see whether recommended intakes
were sufficient to give the best immune responses in young, healthy, unifected
laboratory animals.



Passwater: Now that is a start with two very prestigious vitamin
researchers. Our readers may remember my “beyond deficiencies”
chat with Dr. Machlin in the July 1992 issue. What did your experiments
show?



Bendich: We found that diets low in vitamin E could protect against
certain signs of frank vitamin E deficiency, such as weight loss and testes
degeneration, but the low levels of vitamin E were not sufficient to give
the best immune responses. We were the first to show that you needed three-to-five
times the recommended dietary levels to see the optimal immune responses.
Following these initial experiments, I was asked to join the Vitamin Research
Department and we continued examining the effects of vitamin E, then vitamin
C and vitamin E, and finally, beta-carotene, on immune responses. I was
very fortunate to be the first to document the importance of beta-carotene
as an immunoenhancer separate from its role as a source of vitamin A.



The most satisfying part of this research was our ability to move the research
from laboratory animal studies to humans. Dr. Jeffery Blumberg was crucial
in our beginning the studies at the U.S.D.A. Center of Nutrition and Aging
at Tufts which showed that high dose vitamin E supplements safely enhanced
immune responses in healthy elderly. Dr. Simin Meydani, who was the
primary investigator in these studies, has continued this research and expanded
it further. She has recently also shown that beta-carotene supplements enhance
certain immune functions in healthy older men. In addition, to our collaboration
with the Tufts group, we encouraged Dr. John Bogden at the University of
Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey to examine the effects of a multivitamin-mineral
supplement on immune responses in healthy elderly, and last year, he clearly
showed that this simple, inexpensive, and safe supplement, taken daily for
one year, also enhanced immunity.



I am very fortunate to be at the center of much of the research involving
essential vitamins and carotenoids and immune function, and I am really
excited that the early studies in laboratory animals have resulted in improving
the health of the elderly. We are expanding the area of research and continue
to support WHO-sponsored studies of vitamin A and reduction in childhood
disease morbidity and mortality, and new research areas involving the role
of micronutrients in HIV progression. Another new area which has our support
is the importance of essential fatty acids in reducing autoimmune disease
progression.



Passwater: I understand your satisfaction in helping both children
and the elderly. But, how did you get from immune function to safety?



Bendich: My involvement in vitamin safety issues seems to be a natural
progression which followed our research in humans. The first vitamin E/immunity
studies at Tufts University used 800 IU of vitamin E daily. It was important
to document the safety of this level of vitamin E for obtaining Institutional
Review Board approval of the study protocol. Similar information was needed
for beta-carotene, vitamin A, vitamin C, and vitamin B-6. The review papers
that I have written on the safety of each of these micronutrients have involved
very careful analysis of the published literature, going back 50 or more
years. The conclusions about the safety of each micronutrient are
based upon a prioritization of the source of the data. The highest priority
is given to information published in peer-reviewed journals from placebo-controlled,
double-blind studies. Next in priority are studies which did not include
a placebo, then individual case studies, and finally anecdotal reports.
Following such an in-depth analysis, it is remarkable to find that almost
all of the “safety” issues often mentioned are not based on solid
data
.



Passwater: You have co-chaired conferences bringing together scientists
from around the world studying vitamins and health. Do you see growing awareness
of vitamins in health beyond deficiency diseases? Is the information getting
to the medical profession?



Bendich: I have been privileged to be involved in the organization
of two New York Academy of Sciences Conferences. The first on micronutrients
and immune functions, co-chaired by Dr. Ranjit Chandra, was a very important
meeting because it crystallized the importance of micronutrients in human
immunity. All of the major researchers from around the world attended
and the take-home message was that well before signs of vitamin deficiency
are obvious, immune system reactions have been significantly decreased.
Thus, the immune system appears to have higher micronutrient requirements
than other organs or tissues of the body.
For instance, before vitamin
A levels are so low that vitamin A-related blindness occurs in children,
their ability to fight infections has already been severely compromised.
Thus, marginal deficiencies can really decrease infectious disease resistance,
especially in children.




The second conference on “Maternal Nutrition and Pregnancy Outcome,”
I co-chaired with Dr. C. Keen and Dr. C. Whillhite. This conference also
was critical in changing human health practices. We were able to assemble
virtually all of the researchers involved in finding that folic acid supplementation
significantly reduced the risk of neural tube birth defects. In addition,
Dr. Czeizel reported that not only were neural tube birth defects reduced
in the women who took a folic acid-containing prenatal multivitamin during
the preconception period, but the total number of all types of birth defects
were halved. Following this meeting, the FDA finally allowed the health
claim for folic acid and neural tube birth defect prevention.




Both of these conferences highlighted the growing importance of micronutrients
beyond preventing nutrient deficiency diseases. I think the medical profession
is beginning to hear this message with regard to some issues, but there
is still a lot of education that must be undertaken in medical schools and
through continuing education.



Passwater: Every now and then a preliminary paper or even a letter-to-the-editor
will be published that calls attention to a safety concern or possible problem
with taking supplements. That original question gets plenty of publicity,
but when researchers look into the concern and find that there was no problem
in the first place, the media makes no mention of this. It is non-news and
doesn’t sell papers or make a sound-bite to hold viewers to the evening
TV news.



Let’s discuss some of these concerns and what further research has found.
Does beta-carotene interfere with vitamin absorption or transport?



Bendich: Beta-carotene has many functions including its provitamin
A activity, antioxidant and singlet oxygen quenching capacities. In the
1980’s, the National Cancer Institute initiated several intervention studies
with beta-carotene to determine whether the supplementation could lower
cancer risk.



Certain questions arose from laboratory animal studies with very high doses
of beta-carotene. Very high levels of beta-carotene had to be added to these
diets because rats are very poor absorbers of beta-carotene. The animal
studies showed massive levels of beta carotene lowered vitamin E levels
in the rats. It was therefore of interest to determine whether relatively
small supplements of beta carotene in humans could lower blood vitamin E
or other nutrient levels. The data collected from over a dozen papers since
the 1980’s clearly show that in humans, beta-carotene supplements of even
50 milligrams each day for five years did not effect serum (the clear
fluid of blood) vitamin E levels at all. There are, however, two papers
from small uncontrolled studies where researchers found that beta-carotene
supplements reduced vitamin E serum levels. But, again, the major well-controlled
studies did not find this effect. In fact, in most of the well-controlled
studies, the serum vitamin E levels either remain the same or even increase
when beta-carotene supplements are taken.



Passwater: Most of our readers are aware that vitamin A is “fat-soluble”
and stored in fatty tissues and the liver. Since vitamin A can be readily
stored, it can accumulate in the tissues. However, few readers understand
just how excess vitamin A can actually cause liver damage. What do we know
about the toxic mechanism?



Bendich: Excess retinol (vitamin A) causes changes in biological
membranes, an effect believed to be due to retinol’s surface-active properties.
Retinol, however, does not show surface-active effects when it is bound
to retinol-binding protein (RBP). (RBP is a specific transport protein for
vitamin A that the liver manufactures and secretes to complex with vitamin
A to deliver vitamin A to the tissues.) Therefore, toxicity appears to occur
only when the amount of vitamin A (retinol) exceeds the capacity of RBP
to bind to it. Vitamin A that is not bound to RBP binds to lipoproteins,
and it is in this form it may have toxic effects when it comes in contact
with membranes and body cells. In other words, in vitamin A toxicity, plasma
RBP levels are normal, but concentrations of vitamin A not bound to the
specific RBP are increased.



Vitamin A is stored in the liver. Excess vitamin A may result in increases
in liver enzyme levels in the blood, which is used as an indicator of potential
liver damage. Usually elevated serum liver enzyme levels are reversed when
high doses of vitamin A are stopped.



Passwater: Your review of vitamin A published in 1989 concludes that
incidences of chronic vitamin A toxicity are rare and have averaged fewer
than ten cases per year from 1976 to 1987. You did not find confirmed cases
of vitamin A toxicity below 36,000 IU. In December 1994, physicians at the
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine led by Dr. Thomas Kowalski
reported that in the last three years they have seen 21 cases of liver disease
resulting from high doses of vitamin A. In the paper, they described a 45-year
old woman suffering from multiple medical problems that had liver damage
— reportedly from taking 25,000 IU of vitamin A daily for at least six
years. She reportedly died from this liver failure within months of diagnoses.
The physicians claim that this is the second well-documented case in which
liver damage has resulted from a vitamin A dose as low as 25,000 IU.



Bendich: The case reported by Dr. Kowalski’s group describes a woman
who had high blood pressure, diabetes, an enlarged heart and hypothyroidism.
She was also taking several medications. The cause of death was actually
not described in the article. Nevertheless, it is possible that a level
of vitamin A which does not appear to cause adverse effects in the healthy
population, may have unexpected effects in individuals taking multiple drugs
which can cause liver damage, as in this case report.



Passwater: Once it was believed that all water-soluble vitamins were
without adverse effects at all levels of intake because being water-soluble,
they are not appreciably retained in the body and are “washed away”
in the urine. Niacin has been used in high doses — one may say pharmacologically
— to lower cholesterol. This is not a nutritional use and it has been prescribed
for this purpose by physicians. Is there a dosage above which niacin can
have adverse effects?



Bendich: Niacin is a generic term that includes niacinamide and nicotinic
acid…



Passwater: Excuse me, Dr. Bendich, but perhaps I should interrupt
to explain a little about niacin nomenclature to our readers. The Health
Food industry has always followed the older system of nomenclature that
was used in the United States in the 1940’s. The scientific community uses
the terminology that you just described. The Health Food Industry uses the
term “niacin” specifically to mean “nicotinic acid,”
while the amide is known as “niacinamide.” According to Dr. D.
A. Bender of London University, “the name `niacin’ was coined in the
late 1940’s when the role of deficiency in the etiology of pellagra was
realized, and it was decided that dietary staples should be fortified with
the vitamin. It was felt that `nicotinic acid’ was not a suitable name for
a substance that was to be added to foods, both because of its phonetic
(and chemical) relationship to nicotine, and because it is an acid.”




The pioneers in our industry followed the same reasoning and thus even today,
our labels generally specify “niacin” for “nicotinic acid,”
and niacinamide for the amide form as you mentioned (but also called nicotinamide).
The two forms collectively, but incorrectly, are called “vitamin B-3.”
For the convenience of our readers, I will show the chemical structures
of the vitamers in figure 1 with the scientific nomenclature, and in figure
2 with the nomenclature generally used in the Health Food industry.



It is incorrect to call niacin “vitamin B-3.” Nicotinic acid was
so named in 1867 when it was isolated as an oxidation product of nicotine.
In the 1930’s, there was suggestion that pellagra, the classic “4D”
deficiency disease having symptoms of dermatitis, diarrhea. Dementia and
death, could be a protein deficiency disease or even an unknown water-soluble
vitamin deficiency disease. In 1938, Dr. Spies and his colleagues showed
that nicotinic acid would cure pellagra, but because its chemistry was already
known, it was not assigned a number among the B-vitamins. Although various
researchers placed this vitamin between B-2 and B-6 before its identity
was known, it is still incorrect to call niacin vitamin B-3, because that
was once assigned to pantothenic acid (which is sometimes incorrectly referred
to as vitamin B-5)



Pardon my interruption, but I felt that it was important to clarify the various nomenclature preferences for our readers. Please continue.

Bendich: Niacinamide is the molecule commonly used in multivitamin supplements and is safe. Niacinamide does not lower cholesterol levels. Nicotinic acid has been shown to be a very effective agent in lowering cholesterol when given at high doses. Nicotinic acid, as is true for all cholesterol-lowering agents, increases liver enzyme levels and can cause liver toxicity. High doses of nicotinic acid should be taken only under a physician’s supervision, which should include the monitoring of liver enzymes. There have been reports that the use of time-release nicotinic acid has resulted in liver damage severe enough to require liver transplant.

Passwater: Yes, there is such a big difference in nicotinic acid and niacinamide, some may wonder how such two different compounds can be the same vitamin. They both prevent pellagra (the “black tongue” disease that produces skin eruptions, gastric disturbances and nervous disorders including insanity), and they both can form nicotinamide nucleotide coenzymes (NAD+, NADP+ and NADH). One — nicotinic acid — can cause a temporary skin “flushing” and lower blood cholesterol levels, while the other — niacinamide — does neither.

Since the mid-1980’s, there has been increasing concern over possible adverse effects of vitamin B-6. Do any of the pyridoxine vitamers cause nerve damage?
Bendich: Vitamin B-6 has been used in pharmacologic doses to treat conditions such as premenstrual syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, homocystinuria, galactorrhea and kidney stones. These treatments have generally not been associated with severe adverse effects. However, since 1983, reports have appeared in the literature suggesting that high-dose, long-term administration of pyridoxine produces sensory neuropathy (symptoms such as tingling sensation, loss of feeling, or weakness due to damage or disease of a nerve) in some patients.

Dr. Marvin Cohen and I evaluated the published scientific literature and reported our results in Toxicology Letters in 1986. That study found that the human data on the safety of pyridoxine suggest that oral administration of doses greater than 500 milligrams per day for a prolonged period of time can result in the development of sensory neuropathy. Doses less than 500 milligrams per day appear to be safe on the basis of reports where pyridoxine was administered for periods ranging from six months to six years.

The survey did not reveal any consistent trends for any other adverse effects.

In 1990, we updated our review and examined closely the dose-duration relationship. [12] We concluded that vitamin B-6 intakes of less than 500 milligrams per day for up to two years were safe. However, daily doses above one gram (1,000 milligrams) or total lifetime intakes above 1,000 grams (1,000,000 milligrams) were consistently associated with neuropathy.

As a precaution, I would not recommend the use of vitamin B-6 supplements at levels greater than 200 milligrams per day. Higher doses, if needed, should be used under the supervision of a physician who monitors neurological function.

Passwater: You mentioned that folic acid (folate or folacin) reduces the risk of neural tube birth defects. Yet some hesitate to recommend folate supplements because of a fear of masking B-12 deficiency. Would a supplement containing vitamin B-12 in addition to the folic acid, eliminate this worry? Isn’t the risk of birth defects greater in young women than the risk of a hidden vitamin B-12 deficiency?

Bendich: The U.S. Public Health Service recommendation is that all women of child bearing potential consume 400 micrograms a day of folic acid for the purpose of preventing neural tube defects. There are no data that indicate that this level of folic acid provided through multivitamin supplementation increases the risk of masking vitamin B-12 deficiency. In fact, a recent report showed that elderly who routinely took a multivitamin, which usually contained both folic acid (400 micrograms) and vitamin B-12 ( at 6 micrograms) had a significantly reduced risk of low vitamin B-12 status. Moreover, vitamin B-12 deficiency is rare in women of child bearing potential and the level of vitamin B-12 in the multivitamin would probably help ensure against vitamin B-12 deficiency in young women as well as other age groups.

I continue to recommend folic acid-containing multivitamin supplements as the most practical, inexpensive, and safe source of folic acid for all women of child bearing potential. Another important source is fully fortified breakfast cereals containing 100 percent of the daily value (DV) of folic acid and other essential vitamins and minerals..

I do not recommend that women choose a single supplement of folic acid alone because of three major reasons: first, the research showed added benefits with the multivitamin supplement, such as reduction in the risk of other birth defects in addition to neural tube defects. Second, many young women have numerous marginal deficiencies, including iron, vitamin E, and vitamin B-6 to name a few. The multivitamin can help to eliminate these deficiencies. Third, if a woman is going to change her daily habits and begin to take a “pill” every day, then wouldn’t it be best that the “pill” include all the essential vitamins and minerals?

My answer is Yes!

Passwater: Does vitamin C cause kidney stones?

Bendich: Several studies have found no evidence that vitamin C increases the risk of kidney stone formation. 13-17] Most kidney stones are composed largely of calcium oxalate, and urinary oxalate levels are used as a marker for kidney stone risk. Recently, Dr. Theodore Wandzilak and his team at the University of California at Davis investigated the claim that vitamin C increases urinary oxalate levels. Previous studies suggesting that vitamin C may increase urinary oxalate levels have been flawed because vitamin C interferes with most of the previous methods used to measure urinary oxalate levels. Dr. Wandzilak’s group used a new ion chromatography procedure in which vitamin C does not interfere. Their data show that the ingestion of increasingly large quantities of vitamin C did not cause an increase in the urinary excretion of oxalate. They concluded, “Therefore, the safety concerns raised about increased urinary oxalate level and, as a consequence, an increase in kidney stone formation in healthy subjects are not supported by our findings.” [18]

Passwater: That information, plus the new evidence that calcium does not increase kidney stone formation, shows that the conventional wisdom is not always correct, and that tests must be conducted before valid conclusions can be made. Does vitamin C destroy vitamin B-12?

Bendich: In 1980, Dr. M. Marcus showed that an earlier report suggesting this possibility was due to an artifact of the analytical procedure. [19]

Passwater: Do people have rebound scurvy when they skip or stop taking vitamin C?

Bendich: There is an indication that there is some degree of “conditioning” in white blood cell levels of vitamin C, but this effect is temporary and blood levels of vitamin C do not indicate that vitamin C deficiency develops.

Passwater: Does vitamin C increase iron overload disease incidence?

Bendich: The overall scientific data do not support the premise that vitamin C causes iron overload in normal persons. However, persons with the genetic disorders of hemochromatosis or thalassemia major may find that vitamin C increases the iron toxicity that they are suffering from by mobilizing more of their stored iron. Persons with genetic iron disorders should consult their physicians about the use of vitamin C supplements.

The effect of vitamin C on iron absorption is still an area of active interest. Vitamin C appears to enhance the absorption of non-heme iron consumed in the same meal. However, this effect does not appear to continue to increase with increasing intake of vitamin C. Dr. Marvin Cohen and I reviewed 24 studies which included 1,412 subjects eating meals designed to measure the iron absorption at different levels of vitamin C. We found that vitamin C doses above the RDI level do not increase susceptibility to iron overload in normal individuals.

Passwater Is vitamin C an in vivo pro-oxidant or mutagenic?

Bendich: Harvard researchers have found evidence that vitamin C acts only as an antioxidant in vivo. [20] Even in the presence of transition metal ions, the researchers found that vitamin C acted as an antioxidant rather than a pro-oxidant.

Stich and others have shown that old suggestions that vitamin C might be mutagenic was due to a problem with the testing method. [21] Vitamin C has not been shown to be mutagenic. In fact, many published studies show that vitamin C has anti-mutagenic properties because it is an important antioxidant.

Passwater: Does vitamin C impair copper utilization?

Bendich: This has not been shown in controlled studies. Two groups have investigated this question without finding such a relationship. [22-23]

Passwater: When we were chatting at a scientific meeting a few years ago, you were trying to trace the report that vitamin E could raise blood pressure in some individuals. I remember that the Drs. Shute used to say that this could happen in some diabetics or those who had rheumatic fever. Were you ever able to find evidence to verify these reports? Does vitamin E increase blood pressure in some individuals?

Bendich: No. There are no published reports of increases in blood pressure in any of the placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with dosages up to 2,000 IU per day.

Passwater: Does vitamin E cause tiredness?

Bendich: There are no peer-reviewed, placebo-controlled studies to support this. There have been several studies to examine the safety of vitamin E even at very large doses, and none have reported this as an observation. Usually, the anecdotal reports often suggest increased energy levels.

Passwater: In 1974, I conducted a study of vitamin E usage and health effects [24]. Drs. Linus Pauling and James Enstrom used data from the California subjects in my study and they conducted a follow-up study that showed health benefits in taking supplements. [25] The data on vitamin E showed benefit at all intakes of vitamin E as shown in Table 1. Although, the data showed greater freedom from disease and longevity at the 300 to 499 IU per day levels than the levels above 1,000 IU per day, there was better longevity at all intakes of vitamin E than among those not taking vitamin E.

Some have incorrectly used these data to imply that the higher level represented a toxic effect. What it was actually reflecting was the fact that some very ill persons began taking a large amount of vitamin E to help fight their diseases. Typically, persons in apparent good health usually decide to take about 400 IU of vitamin E daily if they wish its protection against free radicals. If people have a need for extra action from vitamin E, such as to prevent hot flashes during menopause or to relieve intermittent claudication, they often take about 600-800 IU daily. If they are recovering from a heart attack or have been diagnosed with cancer, they often start with 1,000- 1,200 IU daily. Thus, those who are taking more than 1,000 IU of vitamin E daily are often those already suffering from life-shortening diseases.

Still, the 1,000 IU per day level produced greater health and longevity than found in the control group not taking vitamin E supplements. The proportion that died among those taking more than 1,000 IU daily was 0.37, compared to the higher portion of 0.43 among those taking no vitamin E supplements.

]]> 23573 Bioflavonoids, Vitamin P and Inflammation https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/bioflavonoids-vitamin-p-and-inflammation/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bioflavonoids-vitamin-p-and-inflammation Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/bioflavonoids-vitamin-p-and-inflammation/ In October, I was privileged to meet Professor Miklos Gabor of the Albert
Szent-Gyorgyi Medical University of Szeged, Hungary. Dr. Gabor has published
more than 200 research reports and five books on flavonoids. He has also
served as the scientific editor of other books on bioflavonoids. In 1990,
Dr. Gabor received the Jancso Medal and Award for his outstanding results
and scientific work of high quality, and in 1993, he received the Novicardin
Prize awarded by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.



Professor Gabor and I had a common interest besides Pycnogenol(R) research.
We had a common friend, the late Nobel Laureate, Dr. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi
(1893-1986). Professor Gabor was now carrying on bioflavonoid research at
the University named in honor of Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi (Americanized pronunciation
is Saint Jor’-jee).



Before I share what I learned about bioflavonoids from Dr. Gabor with you,
let me tell you a little about Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi, who discovered the biological
importance of bioflavonoids. Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi was born in Budapest, but
was claimed by the U. S. and Hungary alike, and he conducted his research
while spending time in Cambridge, England; the Mayo Clinic, Minnesota; Woods Hole, Massachusetts and Hungary.



Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi was more than a pioneer of biochemistry — he was a “father” of biochemistry. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1937 for
his discovery of the biological oxidation process with special regard to
vitamin C and fumaric acid catalysis. In 1928 he isolated what he at first
called “hexuronic acid,” but is now called “ascorbic acid”
or vitamin C. He also “discovered” the muscle protein actin, actomyosin
and their relationship to ATP. He discovered the C4 dicarboxylic acid catalysis
that forms the basis of the Krebs cycle which was pioneering research on
how food is converted into energy. His keen mind and bright ideas opened
the doors to many areas of biochemical research. He taught us so much, yet
he was often labeled a “maverick” because of his new ideas.



Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi always professed that his discovery of the biological
function of bioflavonoids was serendipitous. He found something he did not
seek. While he was trying to isolate vitamin C, his colleague Professor
I. (St.) Rusznyak had a patient with subcutaneous capillary bleedings. They
thought that vitamin C might help, so they gave the patient an impure preparation
that contained vitamin C plus other compounds. They achieved a rapid success.
Later, a similar patient was treated with a pure solution of vitamin C expecting
quicker success, but instead, the pure solution had no effect. So they went
back to the impure solution. Dr Szent-Gyorgyi suspected that a flavone might
be the key factor.



In 1935, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi and his associate Dr. I. (St.) Rusznyak, isolated
a “factor” from lemon juice that decreased the permeability and
increased the resistance of the capillary wall. At first, chemical analysis
indicated that this factor was a single flavonoid compound and it was named
“citrin.” Because of the effect on capillary health, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi
also called this factor “vitamin P.” [Nature 138:798;1936, Nature
137:27;1936]



He chose “a letter on the far unoccupied side of the ABC” letters
already being used to designate vitamins in case that bioflavonoids were
not found to be true vitamins “correction could be made without confusion.”
The letter “P” was convenient because it could stand for “permeability,”
“purpura” or “petechiae.” The “vitamin P”
normalized the low capillary resistance of vascular purpura patients. In
1936, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi and his associate, Dr. V. Bruckner found that citrin
was actually a mixture of the flavone hesperidin and eriodictiol glycoside,
a flavonol glucoside. [Nature 138:1057;1936]



By 1936, studies by Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi and associates with guinea pigs indicated
bioflavonoids and vitamin C were synergistic and interdependent. In 1936,
Dr. Janey reported the favorable effects of flavonoids on intact and poisoned
frog hearts. In 1937, Dr. Huszak reported on the biochemistry of parenterally
administered “citrin.” Other researchers such as Zemplen, Bognar,
and Farkas actively researched the biochemistry of flavonoids. However,
in 1938, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi reported that he could not substantiate that
bioflavonoids were truly essential nutrients.



It was the discovery in Szeged that called attention to the biological actions
of flavonoids, and from 1940 onwards, researchers from many countries began
studying the biochemical effects of flavonoids such as catechins, proanthocyanidins,
rutin, etc. Hungarian researchers had started the research on the biochemistry
of flavonoids, and today remain leaders in the field.



I had the pleasure of discussing vitamin C and the role of electron transport
and the electronic desaturation of protein molecules in the cancer process
with Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi many times during 1972 through 1979, as well as lecturing
together. Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi would discuss my joint research with Dr. Keith
Brewer on energy transfer in cell membranes via double bond excitation.
This research was published in American Laboratory in a five-part series
from 1974 through 1976.



In a March 19, 1973 letter to me, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi remarked, “I have
not published anything on cancer in a long time, though I have been working
very hard. I arrived at a new concept, but my ideas are not in disagreement
with yours, they are complementary.”



We were both working on our “electronic theory for cancer,” or
as Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi liked to call it, the “electronic dimension of
life and cancer.” Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi called our approaches complementary
because we were both examining the participation of cellular structures
— not just the liquid-state compounds. Also, I was publishing on the free-radical
initiation of cancer and he was investigating the electron transfer system
within structural proteins that allowed them to become semiconductors by
oscillating between two states — one of which was a free radical state.



He had observed that structural proteins in cells are the color of “a
good Swiss chocolate.” The color is due to the presence of an electron
transfer system in structural proteins which transforms them into free radicals.
However, the structural proteins in cancer cells are colorless, indicating
that their electron acceptors are missing or have been damaged.



Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi also found that dicarbonyls produced by the electron transfer
process were capable of stopping cell division. He reasoned that the defective
electron transfer system in cellular proteins allowed the cells to engage
in uncontrolled cell division, thus become cancer cells.



Cancer cells have lost their ability to be semiconductors. Their structural
proteins can no longer accept the single electrons of free radicals, and
thus in turn temporarily become free radicals themselves, and then cause
the formation of cell-regulating by-products such as dicarbonyls.



Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi was a fascinating man with many brilliant concepts, and
provided much encouragement for my research. He often shared his views on
true discovery and how it must by nature seem radical and wrong to everyone
— or it wouldn’t be a true discovery. Occasionally, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi and
I would discuss the role of bioflavonoids as nutrients, and that Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi
still thought that some good modern research would clarify the “essential
or nearly essential” importance of bioflavonoids. You can see that
my meeting Dr. Gabor has brought back many fond memories of Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi
and that Dr. Gabor and I had some long chats about our mutual friend.



In the foreword to one of Professor Miklos Gabor’s books, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi
remarked in 1972, “American science did not take in a friendly spirit
to vitamin P and the name “vitamin” was dropped. More than that,
discussions have been going on to strike the flavones altogether from the
lists of (nutrients and) drugs, since no therapeutic action has been found.
I think the contradiction is due to the fact that in the USA, citrus fruits
belong to people’s regular daily diet. They are rich in flavones, so a (total)
lack in flavones is very rare, and if there is no deficiency, a vitamin
has no action. In contrast to this, in countries where citrus fruits are
expensive, the lack of flavones may cause trouble and their medication may
show favorable effects. While these discussions were going on, important
experimental material was collected in Hungary which, in my mind, leaves
no doubt about the vitamin nature and the biological activity of flavones.





However, others do not share this conclusion. In Dr. Gabor’s 1986 book,
Dr. Middleton writes in the foreword, “There seems to be a resurgence
of interest in flavonoid research in recent years after the vitamin P
era had come to its proper conclusion. ” Dr. Middleton also remarks,
“For many years one worker and his colleagues in the “flavonoid
fields” persistently has kept our attention focused on the relevance
of flavonoid research. This individual, Professor Miklos Gabor, deserves
great credit for his insight and perseverance.”



In October 1993, I had the chance to chat with Dr Gabor who is the world’s
leading expert on the role of bioflavonoids and capillary health and also
to compare stories about Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi. I will try to share some of
his knowledge of bioflavonoids and capillary health with you.



Passwater: Dr. Gabor, did you have the opportunity to do research
with Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi?



Gabor: No, during the stay of Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi at Szeged, I was
a student. However, I did attend his lectures and have the opportunity to
know him then, and of course, we had a continuing scientific dialog through
the years.



Passwater: You are the world’s leading authority on bioflavonoids
and capillary health. You have published many research reports and have
written several books on bioflavonoids, capillary permeability edema and
inflammation. What originally aroused your interest in this field, and what
continues to hold your interest?



Gabor: During the period from 1950 to 1954 in the Department of Pharmacology
of the Szeged University Medical School, I began my research with some naturally
occurring compounds — haematoxylin, haematein, brasilin and brasilein —
which can be broadly considered as members of the bioflavonoid family. Our
research group demonstrated that these natural dyestuffs can decrease the
increased vascular permeability in guinea pig eyes and skin capillaries
of rats.



After we demonstrated the permeability-decreasing action of haematoxylin
compounds, we examined their ability to normalize lowered capillary resistance.
The permeability of capillaries is quite important to health, and the effect
of various nutrients on capillary permeability fascinates me. My first book
deals with the pharmacology of capillary resistance, including the effects
of bioflavonoids. This book “Die Pharmakologische Beeinflussung der
Kapillarresistenz und Ihrer Regulationsmechahanismen” was published
by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Akademiai Kiado, Budapest) in 1960.



In 1965, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences founded a Committee for Flavonoid
research. In 1965 and 1967, I was privileged to organize the first and second
international symposia on bioflavonoids. Since then, these symposia have
been held every four-to-five years. The next international bioflavonoid
symposium entitled the “Ninth Hungarian Bioflavonoid Symposium”
will be held in Wien (Austria) in 1995. However, I have to emphasize that
a conference more limited in scope was the conference on “Bioflavonoids
and the Capillary,” which was organized by the New York Academy of
Sciences and held on February 11, 1955.



In 1972, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi wrote the foreword for my English-language book,
“The Anti-inflammatory Action of Flavonoids.” The foreword to
my 1986 English-language book, “The Pharmacology of Benzopyrone Derivatives
(Flavonoids) and Related Compounds” was written by Professor Elliott
Middleton, Jr. of the State University of New York at Buffalo. So you can
see that my interest in bioflavonoids is very strong.



Passwater: Yes, and so is the interest of Professor Middleton. I
have co-authored a book on Pycnogenol(R) [Keats Publ., 1993] with a colleague
of Professor Middleton at Buffalo, Dr. Chithan Kandaswami. We discuss Drs.
Middleton’s and Kandaswami’s research on cancer and bioflavonoids in this
new book and in upcoming Health Connection columns continuing the interview
series with Dr. Kandaswami.



I also note that Dr. Hans Selye wrote a foreword to your 1974 book, “Pathophysiology
and Pharmacology of Capillary Resistance.”



Evidence is lacking that bioflavonoids are essential nutrients. Is that
because they are not essential or is it merely because that no diets have
been developed that are totally free of bioflavonoids? I note that in the
scientific literature you have studied the blood brain barrier and aorta
structural abnormalities produced by what you call “P avitaminosis”
(a deficiency of “vitamin P”) produced by flavonoid-free diets.
Would you please elaborate a little for us on “P avitaminosis? Do humans
and other animals get enough bioflavonoids in their experimental or normal
diets to prevent a recognized bioflavonoid deficiency from being observed?



Gabor: Many experimental “fragilizing” diets have now been
developed that are totally free of bioflavonoids. Humans and other animals
get enough bioflavonoids in their normal or experimental diets to prevent
a frank bioflavonoid deficiency.



I should like to mention here that the estimated daily dietary intake of
flavonoids in the United States is about one gram. This originates from
cereals, potatoes, bulbs, roots, peanuts, nuts, vegetables, herbs, fruits,
fruit juices, cocoa, cola, coffee, beer and wine. Flavonoids may be present
in amounts up to a hundred milligrams per kilogram of fresh weight in soft
fruits and their juices. Anthocyanin may be present in rich amounts in some
foods such as raspberry, which can contain hundreds of milligrams per hundred
grams of fresh weight. Notable sources of anthocyanins are red cabbage,
onion, beans, radishes, and rhubarb sticks.



The concentration of catechins in ripe fruits is about five -to-twenty milligrams
per hundred grams of fresh weight. Dimeric proanthocyanidins occur in unripe
berries and the leaves of soft fruit plants in amounts ranging between fifty
and five hundred milligrams per hundred grams of fresh weight. Some proanthocyanidins
are present in apples and grapes. Flavonoids are in tea, cocoa, wine and
beer.



Perhaps, Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi was technically correct in saying that certain
bioflavonoids, as a group, should have vitamin status. However, frank bioflavonoid
deficiency is not a major problem. Today we don’t seem to eat enough bioflavonoids
for optimal health, but we do seem to get enough to prevent “P
avitaminosis.” Keep in mind that bioflavonoids are important to blood
vessel health and even protection from heart disease, and there is a definite
benefit to be obtained by optimizing dietary bioflavonoid intake. We should
do more research on the benefits of bioflavonoids and not be distracted
by the question of whether or not bioflavonoids should have vitamin status.



Keep in mind that Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi’s experiments indicated that at least
a trace of vitamin C must be present to observe the vitamin-like effect
of the bioflavonoids. In his experiments, guinea pigs were kept on the scorbutic
Sherman – La Mer – Campbell deficiency diet. One group, the untreated controls,
died in an average of 28.5 days. The group given one milligram of citrin
daily for six weeks lived an average of 44 days. All of the animals in both
groups showed the typical symptoms of scurvy. Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi and his
colleagues concluded, “these results suggest that experimental scurvy,
as commonly known, is a deficiency disease caused by the combined lack of
vitamins C and P.”



Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi asked other scientists to repeat his studies. The results
were partly corroborative and partly negative. In 1937, Drs. Szent-Gyorgyi
and Bentsath stated, “vitamin P requires for its activity the presence
of ascorbic acid. A scurvy diet frequently contains traces which in themselves
have no influence on the development of scurvy, but enable vitamin P to
act. In the total absence of ascorbic acid, vitamin P is inactive.”
[Nature 140:426;1937]



Passwater: There certainly is a synergism between vitamin C and the
bioflavonoids. They protect each other against oxidation and have other
interactions. Let’s move on to the importance of bioflavonoids to health.
Capillaries are important because they carry nutrients to cells and carry
away waste. Capillaries must be permeable enough to allow fluids to seep
out of the capillaries, mix with the fluid that surrounds all of the cells,
and then reenter the capillaries. If the capillaries are too permeable,
too much fluid and protein seep out resulting in edema, and even red blood
cells may also seep out causing bruising and red spots. You have even designed
a simple portable petechiometer to measure the degree of petechiae (small
hemorrhages appearing as red spots) formation permitted by weak capillaries.
If capillaries are too permeable, they are no longer a barrier to infection.
Dr. Gabor, what has your research shown regarding Pycnogenol(R) and capillary
permeability.?



Gabor: I have studied the effect of water-soluble flavone derivatives
including proanthocyanidins and hesperidin-methylchalcone on the vascular
wall resistance in rats with spontaneous hypertension (high blood pressure).
My investigation revealed that the pathologically low capillary resistance
in rats with spontaneous hypertension was normalized by treatment with oligomeric
proanthocyanidin. This research will be published this year in Scripta
Phlebologica
.



Thus, Pycnogenol(R) increases pathologically low capillary resistance, decreases
undesirably high capillary permeability and improves circulation. As I explain
in my upcoming Scripta Phlebologica report, the anti-inflammatory
action of proanthocyanidins may be based on increasing the capillary resistance,
but additional factors should be considered. The antioxidant action of Pycnogenol(R)
has been reported; it can scavenge superoxide radicals, it reduces UV-B
radiation-induced cytotoxicity of fibroblasts and inhibits lipid peroxidation.



Free radicals and other reactive oxygen species are formed at the sites
of inflammation and contribute to tissue damage. The scavenging effect of
Pycnogenol(R) for radicals correlates with its anti-inflammatory activity.
Pycnogenol(R) may also act by inhibiting lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase.



Passwater: Aha! Most people assume that it’s the high blood pressure
alone that bursts the blood vessels, but it is the decreased capillary resistance
and increased permeability that cause the blood vessel to bleed and weaken
enough to burst.



So, if low capillary resistance is common in people with high blood pressure,
and this is a major factor that leads to stroke and retinal hemorrhage,

your study is of major importance to the millions of people with high
blood pressure. Your findings could drastically reduce the incidence of
strokes.
Please elaborate on your study.



Gabor: It has long been known that the capillary resistance is pathologically
decreased in a considerable proportion of hypertensive persons [Griffith
and Lindauer, 1944; Kuchmeister and Scharfe, 1950; Gough, 1962; Davis and
Landau, 1970; etc.]



Special mention should be made of the observation that, if hypertension
is associated with a low capillary resistance, the incidence of cerebral
insults (apoplexy, stroke) and retinal hemorrhage is essentially higher
[Griffith and Lindauer, 1944]. It was established by Paterson in 1940 that
capillary rupture accompanied by intimal bleeding plays a role in the mechanism
of cerebral arterial thrombosis. He assumed that, at the intracapillary
pressure resulting from the high blood pressure, the capillary fragility
(which is enhanced for various reasons) is responsible for the intimal rupture
of the cerebral arterial capillaries.



These data stimulated us to carry out capillary resistance determinations
in spontaneous hypertension rats. As the results reveal, pathologically
low values were observed in the large majority of the experimental animals.



In connection with the flavonoids used, it may be mentioned that oligomeric
proanthocyanidin, isolated from Pinus maritima, was selected because its
indications are to increase pathologically low capillary resistance, to
decrease an enhanced capillary permeability, and to improve the circulation.



My study revealed that the pathologically low vascular wall resistance of
spontaneous hypertension rats can be elevated by treatment with oligomeric
proanthocyanidin.



Passwater: Does your research indicate that Pycnogenol(R) would be
of help to people having fragile capillaries that might result in problems
such as bleeding gums, floaters caused by bleeding into the retina, glaucoma,
bleeding kidneys, and stroke? Also, I have seen European studies that show
that Pycnogenol(R) is a nutritional adjunct that helps against varicose
veins, heavy menstrual bleeding, hemorrhoids and the complications of diabetes.




Gabor: I have not personally conducted clinical trials on these conditions
per se, however, capillary health is compromised in all of these conditions,
and Pycnogenol(R) acts to improve capillary health by improving their bioflavonoid
nourishment.



Passwater: For many years you have been studying the effects of flavonoids
on the capillary resistance of psoriatic patients. A friend of mine in Manchester,
England, Dennis Gore, has reported anecdotal data to me that proanthocyanidins
seem to be effective against psoriasis itself. Have you noticed this in
your studies?



Gabor: Proanthocyanidins are used successfully against diseases characterized
by capillary bleeding associated with increased capillary fragility. The
capillary resistance of psoriatic patients is significantly lower than that
of healthy persons. Pycnogenol(R) tends to restore normal capillary resistance
in these psoriatic patients. However, I have not conducted a clinical trial
of the effect of Pycnogenol(R) on psoriasis as a disease state. I have studied
what may be the causative component of the disease and I have shown that
bioflavonoids can correct this factor.



Passwater: How do the bioflavonoids help capillaries maintain their
proper resistance and permeability?



Gabor: As you know, I have been studying the actions of the flavonoids
in elevating capillary resistance since the early 1950’s and in 1974 I published
a detailed survey of the results of all of the relevant research up to that
date. However, just as with inflammation, we still have a lot to learn about
the “how” part. Even though we need to learn more about the mechanism
involved, we do know that the effects are real. I have observed that Pycnogenol(R)
improves the capillary resistance within two hours and maintains it longer
than eight hours.



Passwater: What has your research shown about bioflavonoids and inflammation?



Gabor: I earlier reported that proanthocyanidin significantly decreased
the inflammation and edema induced by serotonin, prostaglandin or carrageenin.
The decrease is dose-dependent and statistically significant. [Gabor &
Razga, Acta Physiol. Hung. 77:197-207 (1991)] Pycnogenol(R), sophoricoside
and fisetin are the most effective flavonoids against inflammation that
I have tested, and Pycnogenol(R) has the advantage of being very water soluble
and bioavailable.



The mechanisms at play involve the inhibition of several chemical mediators
including histamine, prostaglandins, 5-hydroxytryptamine and kinins. Also,
these flavonoids can block undesirable actions of lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase.




The actions of Pycnogenol(R) against inflammation are different than those
of rutin, hesperidin and the citroflavonoids.



Passwater: What are your interests for future research?



Gabor: Sixty years after the pioneering research by Rusznyak and
Szent-Gyorgyi, the question naturally arises as to the explanation of the
renaissance in flavonoid research. The answer is clear: chemists have synthesized
new flavonoid derivatives with previously unknown biological effects; phytochemists
have isolated numerous new flavonoids from many plants; biochemists have
demonstrated the most varied effects on different enzymes; and an ever increasing
number of pharmacologic effects have become known through variations of
the chemical structures of the flavonoids and related compounds. This research
has led to the discovery of many new drugs that can be applied for therapeutic
purposes. In these words you can find the future of the research of bioflavonoids.
Personally, I am working now with experimentally induced edema and with
the effects of various drugs on this phenomenon.



Thank you, Dr. Gabor.



All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
to © Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).



]]>
23574
The Free-Radical Theory of Aging: Part II – Calorie restriction, Free Radicals and New Research https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/the-free-radical-theory-of-aging-part-ii-calorie-restriction-free-radicals-and-new-research/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-free-radical-theory-of-aging-part-ii-calorie-restriction-free-radicals-and-new-research Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/the-free-radical-theory-of-aging-part-ii-calorie-restriction-free-radicals-and-new-research/ In Part I, Dr. Denham Harman shared the development of the free radical
theory of aging with us. In Part II, he will discuss aspects of calorie
restriction and free radical theory of aging, as well as heart disease and
how you can help aging research.



Passwater: Dr. Harman, in Part I, you mentioned that eating less
food reduces oxygen consumption and the load on the mitochondria. There
is good evidence that calorie restriction — cutting calorie intake by 30%
or so while maintaining high micronutrient levels slows aging. Calorie restriction
seems to lower the levels of undesirable sugar-damaged proteins called Advanced
Glycosylation End-products (AGE).



Harman: Yes. These products are formed by the Maillard reaction.
Interest in the deleterious effects of glucose (blood sugar) in diabetes
focused attention on this reaction, now an active area of research. The
Maillard reaction is initiated by glycation, a reversible non-enzymatic
reaction between reducing sugars such as glucose and ribose, and primary
amino groups on proteins to form Schiff bases (a class of derivatives of
the condensation of aldehydes or ketones with primary amines): these can
form Amadori (rearrangement) compounds . The Amadori compounds slowly —
over months or years — form a heterogeneous group of irreversible compounds
by oxidation, condensation, rearrangements, and elimination reactions collectively
called AGE. Free-radical reactions are involved in the slow-peroxidation
reactions.



Passwater: In Part I, you mentioned that reduced food intake meant
that the mitochondria had to work less and there would be less oxygen cycling.




Harman: It was first shown in the mid-1930s that reducing caloric
intake would increase both the average and maximum life spans and decrease
disease incidence. I believe that this result was due to decreased free
radical damage owing to decreased oxygen utilization. Glycosylation may
play a minor role in this effect as glucose levels go down when calories
are restricted.



Passwater: In Age (15:134, 1992(, Drs. Gary Evans and L. Meyer reported
an increase in both average and maximum lifespan in mice fed chromium picolinate.
The mechanism involved is probably that the chromium picolinate potentiates
insulin and helps prevent glycosylation.



Harman: That was a very interesting experiment. I think the experiment
should be repeated with a greater number of mice. I am sure they, and others,
are going to do this.



Passwater: Do you feel that there might be an additive role if we
could reduce both the free radicals and the resultant oxidation products,
and the glucose levels and the resultant formation of the reversible products,
the two processes may go hand in hand in reducing the amount of irreversible
Advanced Glycosylated End-products.



Harman: I think this would help. Another area of research interest
at the present time concerns the action of deprenyl, a compound used in
the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Deprenyl has been shown to increase
the life span of laboratory rats.



Passwater: Does deprenyl involve free radical protection?



Harman: I suspect that deprenyl serves as an antioxidant.



Passwater: In 1963, you reported in “Circulation” that
serum copper might be related to coronary atherosclerosis. Copper and iron
are only now becoming of serious interest to heart disease researchers.



Harman: Copper is interesting. It is an excellent catalyst for the
reaction between lipids and oxygen. Our studies in miniature pigs were suggestive,
but not adequate to prove that excess dietary copper increased the
rate of atherogenesis. An examination of serum copper levels across the
United States also suggested that excess copper was linked to atherosclerosis,
but again we could not be certain. In this connection, we carried out studies
on isolated serum lipoproteins and showed that their mobility was changed
by oxidation.



Passwater: Most people didn’t even know about lipoproteins in those
days.



Harman: Most of the initial research on serum lipoproteins and atherosclerosis
was done by Dr. John Gofman and his group at the Donner Laboratory of Medical
Physics at the University of California in Berkeley. I was exposed to these
studies during 1954 to 1958 while I was at Donner. The studies on copper
that you mentioned stem from the first paper I wrote on aging and free radicals,
and a subsequent paper published in 1957 in the Journal of Gerontology entitled
“Atherosclerosis: A hypothesis concerning the initiating steps on pathogenesis.”



Passwater: I want to follow that up later, but let’s talk some more
about excess copper.



Harman: I did a number of studies with copper. Some were published
as abstracts of lectures. In one study, we determined the serum copper levels
of men with and without a history of a heart attack. The study was presented
as a talk at the 1963 annual meeting of the American Heart Association and
the abstract published in 1963 in “Circulation.” Because of the
possibility that the higher serum copper levels in men with a past history
of a myocardial infarction might be caused by a “leakage” from
damaged myocardium, I was not able to have the full paper published.



One summer, members of the Framingham study put together serum samples taken
from individuals before and after they had a heart attack; the samples were
crushed during shipment so that we were not able to determine if elevated
copper levels predisposed an individual to atherosclerosis.



Passwater: We need copper to form superoxide dismutase (SOD), one
of the major antioxidants our body makes to protect us from free radicals,
and thus, protect us from oxidation of lipoproteins and subsequent atherosclerosis.
So are you suggesting that there is an optimal range of copper intake?



Harman: You have to have some copper as well as some iron, manganese
and so forth, but the question is how much. If you have too much, you may
be exposed to damaging free radical reactions.



Passwater: Do you see the serum copper level being related primarily
to dietary copper or is another factor involved that can produce various
serum copper levels with the same amount of dietary copper?



Harman: I do not know a factor that can produce various serum copper
levels with the same amount of dietary copper. Most of the copper in the
serum is bound to ceruloplasmin. Some copper is also bound to proteins such
as albumin and to histidine and small peptides.



Passwater: What are you working on today?



Harman: Two things. I am writing a report on the pathogenesis of
Alzheimer’s disease. This disorder may be caused by a mutation in a mitochondrial
DNA molecule early in life — possibly within the first two to three weeks
after conception, that increases the rate of aging in the neurons associated
with Alzheimer’s disease.



The second thing I am doing is raiding money for the American Aging Association.
I resigned recently as Executive Director of the American Aging Association.
Arthur Balin, M.D., Ph.D. now holds this position: he is very competent.



I have been appointed chairman of the Capital Fund Drive of the American
Aging Association. We wish to raise five million dollars. The money would
be placed in a trust fund. The interest, after adjusting for inflation,
will help support the operation of the organization. The fund drive is needed
because membership dues from the small number of scientists working in basic
biomedical aging research would need to be very high in order to just continue
our present activities.



Fund-raising is going to keep me busy. It is very important. I would like
to contact five million people and say, “Please, would you like to
contribute to this organization?” Although this is not possible, I
hope that we can get small donations from many people. I can’t overemphasize
the importance of continuing to promote basic biomedical aging research.



Passwater: Perhaps, if there was an American Aging Association years
ago to support your research, we would all be younger and healthier now.
I have been a member of the American Aging Association since you help found
it in 1970. I, and many other scientists, benefit from the scientific journal
that is published, “The Journal of the American Aging Association,”
and from the annual scientific sessions. How can our readers join the American
Aging Association and what benefits can they get in addition to helping
research that may help them live better longer? Where can readers send donations
to help support the organization and fund aging research?



Harman: They will receive first reports of the latest research in
aging through the newsletter and the journal “Age.” They will
also have the satisfaction of knowing that they are helping to promote research
that will benefit everyone.



Donations, membership dues and subscriptions can be sent to:


Dept. MEM-WF

American Aging Association

2129 Providence Avenue

Chester, PA 19013

Membership dues to the American Aging Association are $35 per year; members
receive AGE NEWS four times per year. Subscription to the journal is $35
per year for non-members and $25 per year for members.



Passwater: The American Aging Association has done a great job so
far, and if you receive the funds, I know you will do more. Have you accomplished
what you set out to do in 1970?



Harman: I was a member of a small group that started the American
Aging Association. The organizers started the American Aging Association
because they felt that more effort should be devoted to basic biomedical
aging. I can’t emphasize enough the need to do basic aging research and
the benefits that it will bring. The American Aging Association has promoted
this area of research and has continued to grow until now it is the largest
group involved in this research area.



Our annual meeting serves to bring together scientists involved in biomedical
aging research and provides an opportunity for the media, and in turn, the
general public, to be informed of progress in this area. Several awards
are presented at the meeting. These include the Distinguished Achievement
Award, the Research Award, and the Excellence in Journalism Award.



The American Aging Association sponsored formation of the American College
of Clinical Gerontology in 1986 in order to more effectively apply the growing
knowledge of aging to the problem of increasing the functional life span.



Formation of the International Association of Biomedical Gerontology was
sponsored in 1985 to help bring together scientists around the world involved
in basic biomedical research. The Sixth Congress of the International Association
of Biomedical Gerontology will be held in August 1995 in Tokyo.



Passwater: There is no point in doing research if you can’t bring
the findings to the public and the physicians who need to incorporate these
findings into the care of their patients.



You were to be the father of this theory, you nourished it, brought it to
people’s attention, beat people over the head with it to get them to expand
the research, you help form the American Aging Association, and now you
are raising funds to support more research. I hope people appreciate all
of your efforts.



Harman: I hope they continue to support increased funding for basic
biomedical aging research. I have testified before Congressional committees
in support of more money for this research field. It is very difficult
to get individuals to understand that cancer or a heart attack is caused
by the aging process and that if we slow this process the disorders that
kill us will be put off in time so that we will have longer functional life
spans
. Funding is increasing slowly — it is now about 25 million dollars
per year, very little in comparison to the billions spent on the obvious
secondary disorders.



Passwater: In 1970 or 1971 you estimated that based on your research
and what was happening that antioxidants might add as much 15 years to the
typical lifespan. Today would you still say proper antioxidant nurture could
add 15 years to the typical lifespan?



Harman: I am not sure because the average life expectancy has improved
during that time. In the early 1970s, we were working with mice and it seemed
reasonable that it might be possible to increase the average life expectancy
of man by around 15 years with the antioxidants. Average life expectancy
in the United States has now reached about 75 years. Since the maximum value
for the average life expectancy at birth is about 85 years, it is now likely
that antioxidants may increase life expectancy an additional five to seven
years.



It would also help to increase life expectancy if people would decrease
their caloric intake somewhat.



Passwater: Well, 50 million Americans are taking antioxidant supplements
and that’s largely why our average life span is increasing. Many people
have already put research into practice. The heart disease death rate has
also decreased — there are many factors involved, but an important factor
is that so many Americans have started taking antioxidant supplements over
the last thirty years.



Your point is well taken that the average life span has increased. But,
still, 30 years ago when you made that statement there was a shorter average
lifespan so you might have been correct saying 10 to 15 years.



Harman: Yes, at that time it might have been true. Today, though,
it is more likely to be around five to seven years. I am very hopeful that
the increase will be a great deal greater. The field of biomedical aging
research is expanding rapidly, particularly since the discovery of superoxide
dismutase by Drs. McCord and Fridovich in 1969, and may lead to practical
measures to slow the biological clock



Passwater: Well now we are zeroing in on getting antioxidants more
efficiently into the mitochondria to control free-radical reactions in what
appears to be a prime factor in our biological clocks. We can also reduce
the amount of free radicals generated in the mitochondria by reducing the
oxygen consumption needed to metabolize all the extra calories of food that
we eat. The problem is to get people to eat fewer calories. That is a big
problem!



Harman: That is education. People need to realize that there are
foods which provide adequate nutrients but with fewer calories. The food
industry is actively involved in this area. For example, they are making
fat substitutes.



Passwater: Also, we can reduce the formation of AGEs by reducing
food consumption and being optimally nourished with chromium. The on-going
research is leading us to new and better antioxidants, as well as new basic
discoveries. If people support the American Aging Association, we will speed
the discovery process and better the lives of more people.



Dr. Harman, what supplements do you take?



Harman: I take 200 milligrams of vitamin E per day; ten milligrams
of coenzyme Q-10 with each meal; one yeast tablet containing 50 micrograms
of selenium twice a day, and I also take one multivitamin tablet.



There are other things involved in living a long life. These include keeping
your weight down at a level compatible with a sense of well-being, getting
a moderate amount of exercise, little or no smoking, and minimal alcohol.
There is nothing new about these suggestions; they have come down to us
from our ancestors.



Passwater: A lot of times, mother was right. Dr. Harman, your research
has taken us for quite a journey into understanding our own biochemistry.
You must feel good when you look back on it.



Harman: I am delighted to see the rapid progress being made in our
understanding of the role of free-radical reactions in biological systems.
From this research are coming measures that will increase our span of healthy
productive life. I appreciate your efforts to keep the general public informed
of these studies.



Passwater: Dr. Harman, thanks again for sharing your journey along
your fascinating research that has already helped millions of people.



All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
to © Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).



]]>
23575
Shark Cartilage and Cancer, Revisited:A follow-up interview https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/shark-cartilage-and-cancer-revisiteda-follow-up-interview/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shark-cartilage-and-cancer-revisiteda-follow-up-interview Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/shark-cartilage-and-cancer-revisiteda-follow-up-interview/ Every day I can count on calls and letters on three subjects — one of
them is shark cartilage. Ever since William Lane, Ph.D. discussed shark cartilage
and cancer with us in the March 1993 issue and the “60 Minutes”
TV show that followed in three-to-four weeks, I have been getting requests
for more information such as how much to use shark cartilage, which doctors
are using it, are the results from the clinical trials known yet, and what
is the latest that is known about shark cartilage. Dr. Lane was kind enough
to address these questions in a follow-up discussion.



To refresh your memory, the first interview discussed how cancer grows,
how shark cartilage destroys tumors and how shark cartilage can be tested
for effectiveness. Basically, cancers that have solid tumors require a blood
supply to feed the tumors. Cartilage is tissue that contains no blood vessels
due to special proteins that inhibit blood vessel formation. These proteins
are called “antiangiogenesis” factors. This term is derived from
“anti” meaning here that it will inhibit, “angio” meaning
“pertaining to blood vessels,” and “genesis” meaning
“formation of.” Without blood vessels to feed the tumor, it will
die.



The blood network of a tumor is fragile. Tumor capillaries are different
from those of normal tissues and may be considered to be “immature.”
Their walls are thinner and decidedly more fragile. Tumor blood vessels
are constantly broken down and replaced by new blood vessels. When an existing
blood vessel is broken down in the presence of antiangiogenesis factors,
it is not replaced by a new vessel and the section of the tumor fed by that
blood vessel dies (necrosis).



Dr. Lane has been lecturing on shark cartilage all over the world, but we
had a chance to chat again during the first week of November at the American
College for Advancement in Medicine (ACAM) where I was speaking on the latest
in antioxidant research.



Passwater: Dr. Lane, in mid-February 1993, the “60 Minutes”
TV show reported on your research with shark cartilage and 29 Stage III
and Stage IV terminal cancer patients in Cuba from late 1992 through early
1993. The story was rebroadcast in July of 1993. Did the “60 Minutes”
show aid or hinder your research efforts?



Lane: The “60 Minutes” show didn’t aid my research efforts
but it seems to have added credibility to shark cartilage therapy. It also
opened the doors for an Investigative New Drug (IND) application with the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The “60 Minutes” show was
better than a peer-reviewed journal article because they did their homework
to prove that it worked. In fact, they spent $350,000 on doing that 12 minute
segment including relatively large expenses to ensure that they weren’t
getting caught in a fraud — especially with the CBS Network’s leading program
and its star, Mike Wallace. So, they studied everything including where
I went to school and if I actually graduated. They went to Cuba with me
four times to see the patients and that is what convinced them. At the beginning,
they saw that the patients were not able to get out of bed. After six weeks
they saw the patients starting to stir. After eleven weeks, they saw the
patients with major tumor reductions On the fourth visit, after sixteen
weeks they were taping Mike Wallace running around the track with this prostrate
cancer patient who couldn’t get out of bed 16 weeks earlier.



Now remember, these patients were diagnosed as being terminal by two physicians.
They were “stage four” patients who were not expected to live
six months. The remarkable thing is that as we speak, it has been two- and-a-half
years after that study started. To get one to live eight months is almost
impossible. It has been 2-l/2 years now and half of those patients are completely
normal people today– running, walking, bathing, swimming. All the brain
cancer patients responded; only nine of the 29 patients died of cancer.
Of those 9 that died of cancer, they all died in the first 17 weeks. Since
that time 6 others died but not of cancer; two in accidents, two had heart
attacks; pneumonia, but not cancer — and 14 of them are normal.



I returned to Cuba last Spring as part of the filming of a documentary now
on my research called “The Politics of Cancer; A study in chaos.”
. While I was there the movie team and I visited with seven of the patients.
One of them — a woman who had a 24-pound tumor — had me to her home. She
broke down and cried and said, “Dr. Lane, without you, I would have
been long gone. I never would have seen my home or my children again. Here
I am again back with my family. It was heartwarming.



The” 60 Minutes” show did my research a lot of good, but it had
a bad side as well. Bad because it suddenly brought in about 30 new competitors.
Some of them are good products but some of them are not. It seems odd that
something that took me years of research to develop took others less than
two weeks. You can’t even run tests in two weeks! Yet, there were 30 new
products on the market in about two weeks. Half of these “overnight”
products were half sugar. There seem to be more sharks on the land than
there are in the ocean.



Passwater: Does “60 Minutes” plan to do a follow up on
your research?



Lane: To my knowledge, “60 Minutes” has never in their
history done a follow-up. They did the story on my research twice, which
is itself is remarkable, and when they did it, it was the promo piece each
time, They are following the work. I talk to Mike Wallace periodically.
Whether they ever do a follow-up is hard to say. It’s not their style but
in the same token they are still very much interested.



Passwater: What has been the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) response?



Lane: NCI is still saying “we still don’t know about it,”
” it’s no good,” ” the Cuban study was worthless,” “come
to us with a $2 million study, fully documented, and we may look at it.”
NCI is still very negative. The support that I have gotten is from the FDA.
The FDA, especially the New Drug Application Department, has bent over backwards
to cooperate with me. There is an Phase II Investigative New Drug (IND)
study underway for Cartilade(tm) led by Dr. Michael Rothkopf. Now the FDA
is telling me that they will give the “fast track” to a new product
that I am researching called BeneFin(tm). We plan to have the submission
stage underway before the end of 1994. We will be submitting for IND approval
for Kaposi’s Sarcoma which is a tumor-like situation common in AIDS patients,
as well as for prostate cancer.



Passwater: You mentioned following up with the Cuban patients. Do
you have much follow-up with patients taking shark cartilage?



Lane: I am involved with some patients first hand as part of clinical
trials conducted by various physicians. I also refer a lot of patients to
doctors who use shark cartilage in their treatments. I have to rely on these
patients or their doctors calling me to let me know what is happening. This
is second hand and is never very accurate. Each week I get receive an average
of 20 to 30 “God Bless You, Dr. Lane, for keeping me (or their loved
ones) alive letters. I have kept a file. In fact in my new book called “Sharks
Still Don’t Get Cancer,” I discuss several cases that are complete
with the proper documentation from the medical community. We’re finding
tremendous effect on brain cancer; in fact, I’d say we’re getting almost
100 percent response on various types of brain cancer.



Passwater: How about ovarian and breast cancers?



Lane: We don’t see that many ovarian or uterine/cervical cancer cases
any more. Years ago there seemed to be more. It’s breast cancer that is
increasing alarmingly in the U.S. Now you will find the uterine and ovarian
cancers in the underdeveloped countries presumably because the men don’t
wash as much so women have more infections which are believed to increase
the risk of uterine and ovarian cancers. In our society we get less cancer
percentage-wise in that part of the human body. I am a consultant for many
physicians who use shark cartilage in their therapy for breast, prostate,
brain, and lung cancers and most other solid tumors.



What breaks my heart is that my office also gets a lot of calls from multiple
myeloma, Hodgkin’s and lymphomas which I can’t help. I tell you it makes
you cry. I try to insulate myself not to talk to the patients because I’m
not a medical doctor. Sometimes my assistant who takes many of the calls
tells me that I have to take a certain call because it is so pathetic and
I try to help them by referring them to one of the doctors on my list. I
have set up a network of doctors in different areas of the world to which
I refer patients. In fact here at the American College for Advancement in
Medicine (ACAM) meeting where we are talking, I have added 20 more doctors
to my network.



Passwater: The word about shark cartilage eliminating tumors in stage
III and stage IV terminal cancer patients is getting around among holistic
physicians. Are orthodox physicians using shark cartilage therapy to any
great extent?



Lane: I estimate that twenty – to- twenty-five thousand people are
using shark cartilage therapeutically around the world. Japan and the entire
Far East have become a gigantic market for shark cartilage. As big as the
United States is, it can’t hold a candle on a per capita basis to some of
these other markets. It’s because the conventional doctors are slow to try
it. If they get sick or their wives gets sick or their children get sick,
I get a phone call. But most physicians don’t use it for their patients.
Since no large drug company is involved, their is no sales person or “Detail
man” calling on the doctors.



Some of the physicians that do know about the benefit of shark cartilage
are still afraid to use it on their patients. I can understand this in a
way, and it bothers me in another way, because they take an oath to help
their patients but they seem more concerned about possibly being sued. There
are ways they can get around that. They can suggest to the patient –“Look,
we can’t help you but there is something else and I’ll be happy to monitor
you.” In that manner, the doctor isn’t at risk of a suit, but most
of the doctors aren’t even willing to go that far.



We are talking here in California at the ACAM meeting. I have spoken in
California, the Los Angeles area maybe twenty times in the last three years.
Telly Savalas died of advanced prostrate cancer. No excuse, as we get 90
percent response on prostrate cancer; did his doctors try it? No! They just
let him die. Dr. Linus Pauling and I had an hour talk two months before
he died . He heard about my research and he wrote to me. At the end of our
talk he said, “Dr. Lane, you’ve got something that is good; I know
it, but I have devoted my life to vitamin C and I would find it very hard
not to follow along with it.” What’s the answer? I don’t know. People
are humans and every human has to make his or her own decision.



Passwater: Can patients call you to help locate a doctor near them
that is trained in using shark cartilage therapy?



Lane: I have set up an information service with an 800 number (800-742-7534)
People who call will be sent a list of the 15 most asked questions and their
answers about shark cartilage. Then if they want to follow up we will check
the list of doctors in the network for doctors in their area or nearest
their area. The problem is there is always someone who will call from a
town where there is no one trained in shark cartilage therapy. It’s a matter
of life and death so even if there isn’t a local doctor trained, I recommend
that the patient travels to where there is a doctor trained in shark cartilage
therapy. There just isn’t one in every town or in every city.



Passwater: Not yet. How do you train doctors in shark cartilage therapy?



Lane: It’s hard. Most of them are so locked up in orthodox medicine,
but I can tell you it is changing. My research was just written up in “Oncology
Times” which goes strictly to oncologists. The article was only lukewarm,
so I wrote a letter to the editor. They printed it on Page 2 in the October
1994 issue and they printed it in its entirety. So we are getting through.
It takes time but alternative medicine has made more strides in the last
two years than it has made in the ten previous years.



Passwater: You have researched shark cartilage for many years and
developed the product. It has been more than a year since our first Whole
Foods discussion. What have you learned about shark cartilage since then?



Lane: Well, I developed that original product five years ago and
I think it was a great breakthrough in that we helped a lot of people. That
the product worked but like anything else, further research leads to improvements.
When helping physicians treat cancer patients using shark cartilage therapy,
the big problem was that we might start 10 patients on it, but only one
or two would stay on it because the of the taste and odor. In Australia
I discovered a new technology when I was there presenting my research to
a major big health conference.



This new technology uses a “good” bacterium to clean shark cartilage
of flesh including the blood vessels and the nerves in the channel in the
backbone. In addition, this new technology is even able to clean the cartilage
without having to cut off the fins that stick out of the backbone. When
cartilage is cleaned by hand, these fins have to be cut off. But, these
fins contain a lot of the antiangiogenic activity. The good bacterium used
in the new technology only removes the shark meat and not the cartilage,
so those fins stay on. As a result, a product has now been developed, called
BeneFin(tm) , which is about 35-40 percent more effective antiangiogenically



as an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Just as important, it has a major reduction
in smell and odor and has no aftertaste at all. The aftertaste of shark
cartilage made by the old method caused nausea in many patients and was
the major reason why patients discontinued its use. In addition, the new
process is around 30-35 percent less costly because there is little manual
labor involved as the bacterium does the work.



Passwater: Since you use a bacterium to clean the product, some readers
may be concerned that the product may be contaminated with bacteria. Would
you please comment on that?



Lane: There are good bacteria and there are bad bacteria. The lactobacillus
strains are good bacteria and this a variation of those strains. Still,
the product is almost sterile and this is achieved without heat or chemicals
— not even ethylene oxide, and without irradiation as these processes could
harm the fragile antiangiogenesis (angiogenesis inhibiting) factors in the
shark cartilage. As I said, the problem has been the taste and odor. The
bad taste and odor are partly caused by the blood vessels and nerves of
the backbone that can’t be removed by mechanical cleaning, and partly by
the high bacteria load which has been on the product. The bacteria count
can be in the trillions which are killed in the end, but all the time they
have been alive they have been making toxins. These toxins are not removed
and those toxins and plus all these dead bacteria bodies result in a distinctive
taste. It’s fine to kill the bacteria at the end, but it’s a lot better
to keep the product basically sterile throughout and not have the toxins
and dead bacteria accumulate.



Passwater: In our March 1993 discussion, you educated our readers
on the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) assay. Now you are relying on
the Quantitative Endothelial Cell (QEC) assay. Please tell our readers about
this test and why you use it?



Lane: I stopped using the CAM assay about a year ago because there
was such inconsistency with results. Fertile eggs must be used and there
is great variability in the length of time that the eggs have been fertile.
Another factor that causes variability is the egg of the hen. Whether or
not the hen has just started to lay eggs or is at the end of her productive
cycle makes a difference in the CAM assay. I found too much variation and
poor correlation.



In the QEC assay, which has been developed and is being used in California
by one of the top universities and a professor who has worked on shark cartilage
almost as long as I have worked on it. Shark cartilage works by stopping
endothelial cell development. Endothelia cells are needed to make the walls
of the blood vessel. If you stop the formation of the walls of the blood
vessel, you stop the formation of the blood vessel and you stop the feeding
mechanism which brings about the necrosis. Basically, the QEC assay uses
known amounts of cultured endothelial cells divided into aliquots to which
known amounts of test materials and standards are added. These aliquots
are incubated for three days. After three days, you go back and weigh the
endothelial cell cultures and compare the results to the standards and controls.



You then determine if the growth of endothelial cells in the control culture
was good. If it is normal, then we proceed with the test and assign the
control a relative value of 100%. Next we measure the test cell cultures.
Let’s say that the product we are testing produced very modest growth, which
means the inhibitor worked pretty darn well. You give that sample a gradation
based on the its comparative weight. So the QEC assay is a very accurate
evaluation.



We have done this measurements on only two products so far, but we will
do it on all of the major shark cartilage products being sold. We did it
on the new product BeneFin(tm) and we did it on the product that was the
standard before, a product called Cartilade(tm). We have shown that the
BeneFin(tm) is about 35 percent more effective based on the QEC test, and
we have it now on two evaluations. I will evaluate another seven or eight
products when I return from this meeting. I am particularly interested in
seeing if any inhibition results from a product from Canada that is being
marketed that is about 99-l/2 percent water. The manufacturer claims that
if you take seven milliliters of their liquid, it produces the same results
as 100 grams of shark cartilage powder. It sounds preposterous and I have
found the patients are dying on that one and so I’m going to be sure to
evaluate that one. I’m going to evaluate all of the major shark cartilage
products by this comparison. This test is an expensive test but it’s a very
meaningful test and I take the position that before a product is sold to
someone in a life and death situation, the patient that is putting out the
money deserves to have the person who is selling it to him or her do some
research. Concrete evidence is needed, not just saying it’s good. I want
to provide meaningful evidence for comparison to the people who spend the
money.



Also, I am hoping to get some human studies going pretty quickly, in China,
possibly in Russia, possibly in Malaysia and then hopefully in the US we
will have FDA approval we’ll have the U.S. studies with the FDA’s approval.
In the meantime, I will have QEC assays and bacteria evaluations which are
the only evaluations provided on shark cartilage products. Additionally,
human clinical trials have now been arranged for breast and uterine/cervical
cancers in Mexico to start in January 1995 at the Contreras Clinic.



Passwater: Are you still seeing good results with shark cartilage
on rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis?



Lane: Yes, it’s amazing. When you are treating cancer, you often
find improvement in other diseases the patient has as well. Many of the
patients in the Cuba study had either psoriasis or rheumatoid arthritis.
While these patients were being treated for cancer, all of sudden after
four weeks, the psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis just disappeared at that
high dosage rate. Patients of those diseases who do not also have cancer
will be helped at a lower dose, but it will take longer. So, I am now suggesting
about 30 grams a day for psoriasis patients and I am finding people are
responding beautifully. I mean that within four to five weeks it’s a different
person. With rheumatoid arthritis, you can’t reverse the knurled knuckles,
but you can ease the pain. If there is a pinched nerve, the shark cartilage
doesn’t help, but if it is angiogenesis as you find in a lot of rheumatoid
arthritis patients, shark cartilage has a good affect.



Passwater: While we are discussing the amount to take, let’s review
your recommendations for cancer patients.



Lane: In all of my previous research with shark cartilage, and the
clinical trials on non-responsive advanced breast and prostate cancers,
including the FDA IND now underway, a dosage level of one gram of shark
cartilage for each kilogram of the patients body weight (about one gram
per each 2.2 pounds of body weight) has been used. Routinely, this level
has shown promising results with many desperate cases. This dosage level
is significantly higher than the dietary dosage recommended on shark cartilage
labels which are intended for nutritional dietary supplement purposes. For
patients with extremely advanced cancer, some doctors have nearly doubled
the dosage to almost one gram of shark cartilage for each pound of body
weight with good results and no observed toxicity or side effects. As I
said, some patients don’t like the taste and don’t like to take that much,
so perhaps the new product can be used in lesser quantity because it is
more effective. Hopefully, the Mexican study about to begin will give more
information tying the QEC assay to human clinical trial results.



Passwater: Are there any tricks to help the patient tolerate the
taste?



Lane: The new product tastes much better, but generally when shark
cartilage is taken orally, it is mixed with a pulpy juice such as pineapple,
tomato or apricot nectar. Up to 20 grams (4 level teaspoons) of shark cartilage
powder is blended in a mechanical blender with 6-8 ounces of juice to make
a frothy and aerated “shake.” This is taken three or four times
daily, usually before meals.



If taken rectally via a retention enema, use 20 grams in 3-4 ounces of body
temperature water. It is introduced into the lower rectal area as a free-flowing
slurry using a 3-4 foot hose from an enema bag or a kit is available from
Real Life Products at 800-547-6649 (* check last digit could be a 7). Often
a few drops of aloe vera added to the slurry produces a smoother mix. Load
3-4 large (60-80 cc) plastic syringes with the slurry, insert one end of
the hose into the rectum, and squeeze the loaded syringes through the hose.
Laying on one side for 25 minutes allows absorption. Remember, this is a
retentive, not evacuative, enema.



Passwater: When can a patient expect to see results?



Lane: Many patients, learning of remarkable results for cancer patients
being treated with shark cartilage, anticipate immediate, dramatic improvement
in their own condition. After a week or two of treatment, they often become
disappointed when expected improvements are not noted; immediately they
cease continuing with shark cartilage and miss an opportunity that may save
their lives.



Similar to every other cancer treatment, shark therapy does not produce
immediate improvement in a patient’s condition. Occasionally patients will
experience an improved quality of life as early as the fourth week. However,
with advanced cancer, results are rarely noted in less than six-to-eight
weeks. I cannot stress enough the need for patience. Remember, it took years
to develop the cancer and this is a biologic response which takes time.



As the quality of life continues to improve other results follow — continued
reduction of pain, tumor size reduction and tumor morbidity (tumor death).
As I mentioned in our first discussion, this tumor encapsulation has been
confirmed by examination and the “Swiss-cheese” effect can be
observed by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) and Computer-assisted Tomography
(CAT scan).



Passwater: Dr. Lane, your research is an amazing story, one of the
most important advances in alternative medicine as well as in the nutrition
and health food arena. We will all be awaiting the FDA IND and Mexican clinical
trial results. Thank you for keeping us up to date.



All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
by © Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).



]]>
23576
Alcohol, AIDS and Nutrition https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/alcohol-aids-and-nutrition/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=alcohol-aids-and-nutrition Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/alcohol-aids-and-nutrition/ During a prior chat with Dr. Luc Montagnier, I mentioned the research
of Dr. Ronald Watson that indicates that at least some antioxidant nutrients
improve important components of the immune system. This was of particular
interest to Dr. Montagnier so I described the preliminary research of Dr.
Watson’s group at the University of Arizona, which he had just reported
at the Second International Pycnogenol Symposium held in Biarritz, France
in May, 1995.



Dr. Watson and I shared the platform as two of the presenters at that symposium.
I had described the dramatic results achieved by Pycnogenol(R) in treating
Attention Deficit Disorder, and Dr. Watson reported on Pycnogenol(R) and
the immunomodulation in retrovirus-infected mice. The Human Immune Deficiency
Virus (HIV) that causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Disease (AIDS) is a retrovirus.
Dr. Watson studies in laboratory animal model that is reasonably close to
human HIV and AIDS. This model system involves a similar retrovirus called
LP-BM5 murine leukemia which produces total dysfuntion of the immune system
resulting in murine AIDS.



Many readers may be familiar with Dr. Watson’s research with vitamin E and
beta-carotene which strongly suggests that they may delay progression of
HIV infection to clinical AIDS. Dr. Watson spoke at July’s NNFA Convention
in Las Vegas on “Nutrition as an adjunct to AIDS therapy.”



Dr. Watson has edited 35 books and more than 350 research reports on alcohol,
nutrition and their interactions with immunology and cancer. His most recent
book is “Nutrition and AIDS” (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 1994)
His research focuses on antioxidants to prevent cancer and AIDS by immune
enhancement, and the use of vitamin supplementation to treat immunosenescence.
He is a professor of research in the Department of Family and Community
Medicine of the University of Arizona in Tucson. He has directed a National
Institutes of Health funded Alcohol Research Center focusing on alcohol-immunology-AIDS
interactions. Dr. Watson received his Ph. D. from Michigan State University
in 1971, and studied immunology as a post-doctoral fellow at Harvard University.



As we were returning from Biarritz, we stopped in Bordeaux, the heart of
France’s best wine country. Over breakfast, we had a chance to chat about
recent epidemiological studies on health and wine consumption. I think that
many readers will be interested in Dr. Watson’s comments on alcohol’s negative
effects on the immune system. However, first I want to get back to the subject
of the effect of antioxidant nutrients on delaying AIDS.



Passwater: AIDS patients exhibit nutritional deficiencies which themselves
impair the immune system. HIV infection and poor nutritional status seem
entwined — one as a cofactor for the other. A lifestyle that fosters poor
nutrition increases susceptibility to HIV infection, and HIV infection leads
to poor nutritional status. Has your research helped identify the individual
effects of each factor?



Watson: In some cases, such as drug or alcohol abusers, their lifestyle
results in both poor diets and decreased efficiency of absorption of nutrients
through the intestine. Adequate nourishment is critical for HIV-positive
persons. Several features of HIV infection increase the risk of malnutrition.
The gut is a major target for symptoms of AIDS-related diseases, including
diarrhea, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), oral and esophageal candidiasis,
and odynophagia (pain while swallowing). In turn, these complications predispose
these patients to malabsorption and sepsis, which furthers malnutrition.



Undernourished persons have impaired immune responses. Particularly impaired
cell-mediated immunity, but also impairment in the complement system, phagocytes,
mucosal secretory antibody response, and antibody affinity. These immune
system abnormalities in turn increase the risk of infection.



It is useful to correct malnutrition, but it may be even more important
to learn if specific nutrients can restore the immune system to normal in
HIV-infected persons. Thus, our work with a mouse model of AIDS, which is
infected with a retrovirus which induces immune dysfunction, is very helpful.
We can eliminate the lifestyle factor. The mice consume normal amounts of
an adequate diet and do not use drugs or alcohol. Yet, they have higher
oxidative damage and lower vitamin E levels. In addition, their immune systems
are stimulated by supplemental vitamin E. Thus, it is likely that changes
induced by the retrovirus infection induce deficiencies of antioxidant vitamins
per se, without any dietary problems
.



An important observation is that if the mice consume alcohol or administered
cocaine during their retrovirus disease then their immune systems and vitamin
E levels are further reduced, with accelerated growth of cancers. Our animals
tell us that vitamin E supplementation is helpful, but not a cure, and that
even uninfected animals benefit from high vitamin E and other antioxidant
intakes.



Passwater: Does HIV infection increase oxidative damage which in
turn consumes antioxidant nutrients?



Watson: While the mouse data say yes, the human studies are limited.
It does seem likely, but much more needs to be done in this area.



Passwater: Does improving nutritional status in people with HIV-infection
or AIDS increase their well-being or longevity?



Watson: This study has not been done in people. In mice, improving
nutritional status with supplements of vitamin E increased immune responses
during their decline to murine AIDS, but did not extend the longevity
of the mice. As death from AIDS occurs due to poor responses to opportunistic
pathogens, improving damaged immune systems with nutritional supplements
should delay final declines and extend quality and length of life,
but the human tests have not been done. Several small studies with beta-carotene
suggest improved immune responses, but these studies were too small in scale
to show survival benefits.



Passwater: When and why did you become interested in nutrition and
AIDS?



Watson: My research has been focused by funding provided by a private
non-profit foundation (WGF) for a number of years on the benefits of supplementation
with single and then multiple antioxidants in older people whose immune
systems are dysfunctioning, but not as drastically as AIDS patients. It
became clear that there were significant benefits, especially for the person
with a damaged immune system, to multiple antioxidant supplements based
upon a surrogate marker like immune responses rather than adequate growth
of young animals. So when I got an NIH grant to study alcohol and immunology,
it was logical to use a mouse model of immune damage (murine AIDS) and to
try to find ways to overcome the damage of alcohol.



We chose first to study the effects of vitamin E supplementation. Let me
add that while vitamin E supplementation does largely overcome the damage
of alcohol to the immune system, in non-alcohol using mice, it further reduces
tumor growth. Thus, the key is to avoid first any immune-damaging lifestyles
and agents, like alcohol, then to try to optimize one’s own situation with
multiple antioxidant supplements.



Passwater
: What does HIV do to the immune system?



Watson: It causes immune dysfunction with death to some cells (CD4+
T helper lymphocytes) and aberrant production of regulatory proteins called
interleukins which shut down cellular defenses and cause humoral (antibody
mediated B lymphocytes) to be stimulated but with little functional benefit.



Passwater: Recently, your research team has published results of
your vitamin E and beta-carotene investigations. Would you please summarize
them for us?



Watson: Our studies suggest that vitamin E and beta-carotene may
be beneficial for treating HIV infection, but actual clinical trails are
needed to confirm this hypothesis. Vitamin E stimulates the helper function
and mitogenesis of T cells, and may enhance T and B cell action as well.
We have found that vitamin E has increased the CD4/CD8 ratio, lymphocyte
count, natural killer cell activity, phagocytosis, and mitogen responsiveness
in both uninfected and retrovirus-infected mice. Vitamin E supplementation
of normal mice at fifteen times the RDA increased a variety of immune functions.
This applies to T and B cell functions which are suppressed by murine retrovirus
infection. Vitamin E normalizes aberrant interleukin production in murine
retrovirus-infected mice.



Also, of great importance, vitamin E restores tissue stores of both vitamin
A and vitamin E that are reduced by murine retrovirus infection, and thus
reduces the retrovirus-stimulated oxidative damage.



Our pilot study in HIV-infected persons showed that 30 milligrams of beta-carotene
daily was not toxic and had immunomodulating effects. Three months of beta-carotene
supplementation in HIV-positive persons increased immune markers in natural
killer cells, but not in helper T cells.



Passwater: Vitamin E and beta-carotene are getting a lot of research
attention these days, but what piqued your interest in Pycnogenol(R)?



Watson: We were asked to investigate a new antioxidant being used
by humans, but unknown to me at that time, in our mouse models, as a favor
to a colleague. We found that it had no negative effects on growth, food
consumption, or immune functions in the mice. It stimulated several immune
systems to some extent that were damaged by alcohol use or early retrovirus
infection. The most significant finding was that it stimulated natural killer
cell activity in uninfected, alcohol using, as well as retrovirus infected
mice. Natural killer cells kill tumor cells and are the first line of defense
against new tumors that arise in our body almost daily.



Passwater: I realize that your studies are continuing and will be
submitted for publication shortly, but can you review some of the details
that you presented in Biarritz?



Watson: We reported that Pycnogenol(R) enhanced the immune response
of interleukin-2 in both retrovirus-infected mice and alcohol-fed mice.
Pycnogenol(R) also reduced elevated levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10
during retrovirus infection and alcohol consumption. Natural killer cell
cytotoxicity was increased with Pycnogenol(R) and this effect helped normalize
the lost activity of natural killer cells during retrovirus infection. These
changes are in the direction of returning a suppressed immune system back
towards normal.



Immune dysfunction during LP-BM5 retrovirus infection is remarkedly comparable
to HIV in humans: splenomegaly, lymphadenopathology, and hypergammaglobulinemia
with progressive defects of T and B cell functions, and reduction of host
resistance to pathogens and neoplasia. In HIV-positive patients and murine
retrovirus infection T-helper 1 cells decline while interleukin-6 and interleukin-10
secretion by T-helper 2 cells increases. Murine AIDS, induced by retrovirus
infection, develops into a progressive and profound immunodeficiency with
loss of antioxidants as occurs in human AIDS.



T-helper 1 cells produce interleukins including interleukin-2 and gamma-interferon
to induce cellular immunity, regulate cells and suppress interleukin production
by T-helper 2 cells. Pycnogenol treatment of uninfected, normal mice did
not cause a significant change in interleukin-2 production. Interleukin-2
production in mitogen-stimulated cells was significantly decreased by alcohol
consumption and murine retrovirus infection when compared to cells from
the uninfected control animals. In both instances, the production of interleukin-2
was significantly increased by Pycnogenol(R) when the cells were compared
to those of the controls.



T-helper 2 cells produce interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 which suppress
T-helper 1 cells, which is part of the immune dysfunction seen in murine
AIDS. Supplementation with Pycnogenol(R) caused no significant change of
interleukin-6 production by cells from normal control animals. However,
Pycnogenol(R) exhibited a significant increase of interleukin-6 production
in alcohol-fed mice when compared to untreated mice, with and without alcohol
consumption. Our data also show that interleukin-6 production, which
is significantly elevated during murine retrovirus infection, was significantly
reduced by Pycnogenol(R) supplementation
.



Mice given Pycnogenol(R) showed no significant change in interleukin-10
levels when compared to uninfected, normal mice. However, there was a significant
decline in interleukin-10 production in alcohol-fed mice given Pycnogenol(R)
supplementation when compared to alcohol-fed controls. A significant increase
in interleukin-10 was observed for retrovirus infected mice. Interleukin-10
secretion by cells from alcohol-fed mice was not significantly different
from that of uninfected normal mice. However, the level of interleukin-10
production by spleen cells from mice given Pycnogenol(R) supplementation
during alcohol consumption, and retrovirus infected was significantly normalized
when compared to uninfected mice not given treatment.




There was a dramatic increase in natural killer cell cytotoxicity for all
three effector-to-target ratios in Pycnogenol(R) supplemented mice when
compared to untreated mice. For the 100:1 effector-to-target ratio of retrovirus-infected
mice, there was a significant decrease in natural killer cell activity when
compared to the infected normal mice. This decrease was significantly
normalized with Pycnogenol(R) supplementation.



Passwater
: You have spent several years studying the effects of alcohol
on the immune system and you have written extensively about your findings
and the findings of other groups. Can you summarize your findings for us?



Passwater: We have investigated alcohol use in mice and people for
7 years, as well as getting numerous colleagues to summarize their research
in 8 books on alcohol’s actions on the body. The summation of all that work
is that “ALCOHOL HAS NO REDEEMING BENEFIT AND ALMOST ANY IMPORTANT
SYSTEM IN THE BODY IS DAMAGED TO SOME EXTENT BY ALCOHOL USE
.” We
in particular found that alcohol use suppressed immune systems, especially
when damaged by retrovirus infection, increased oxidative damage, reduced
tissue nutrient levels in animals eating adequate diets, reduced lifespan,
and promoted tumor growth. Colleagues have shown recently that alcohol use
increases the susceptibility of cells to invasion and growth of HIV. My
personal conclusion is to never drink alcohol for my personal health and
as an example to my children of its extensive, slow damage to health
.



Passwater: It is true that there have been at least a hundred epidemiological
studies over the past thirty years that suggest moderate drinking has benefit.
However, I have always contended that the significant health benefits come
from the bioflavonoids and other polyphenolic antioxidants extracted from
the stems, seeds and skins of the grapes, rather than the alcohol in the
wine. Yes, there are studies that suggest that two sub-groups of high-density
lipoproteins, HDL2 and HDL3, increases with alcohol consumption, but it
is yet to be demonstrated that these sub-groups have the same protective
effect as HDL1. Besides, the effect as measured is too small to account
for the protective effect measured. This observed protective effect can
be accounted for by improvements in blood platelet factors. There are also
studies linking decreased blood levels of tissue plasminogen activator,
but it is not clear that alcohol per se accounts for this change. Meanwhile
there are other studies that show the bioflavonoids do promote health and
longevity.



I remember a study nearly twenty years ago that compared the effects of
drinking wine or wine in which the alcohol had been removed to a placebo
of grape juice. The researchers found improvements in blood chemistries,
including reducing the stickiness of red blood cells that encourages them
to clump together (platelet adhesion indices), in the groups drinking either
the normal wine or the alcohol-free wine compared to those who drank the
grape juice. This indicated that the improvements came from the body of
the wine that did not involve alcohol. Then a comparison was made between
those who drank either grape juice or grape juice that had been spiked with
alcohol, and no difference was observed in their blood chemistries.



An obvious factor is that both red wine and white wine have the same alcohol
content, but it is only the red wine, with it’s high proanthocyanidin (a
branch of the bioflavonoid family) content that is significantly protective.
Dr. Alexandra Lavy of Israel reported in 1994 that red wine boosts HDL by
26 percent, but white wine does not. Pycnogenol(R) is also rich in proanthocyanidins.
Proanthocyanidins are the precursors of the red pigments found in red wine.
Essentially the same types of grapes are used in making both red wine and
white wine, but in making white wine, the “must” — grape particles
including skin, stem and seed particles — are removed early in the process
before they have a chance to color the liquid.



In several studies that show that moderate wine drinking has a protective
effect, the drinking of beer or hard liquor do not show a health benefit
at any consumption level. In fact a 1995 Copenhagen study shows that three
to five drinks of hard liquor daily increases the risk of death by 36 percent
compared with not drinking liquor.



Earlier this year, Dr. John Folts and his colleagues at the University of
Wisconsin published a study that agrees with the premise that it is not
the alcohol, but the bioflavonoids that provide health benefits. Dr. Folts
is perhaps the premier researcher on blood platelet adhesion. In 1973, he
developed the test that is still used today to test for impact on platelet
adhesion. In 1974, Dr. Folts was the first to demonstrate aspirin’s effect
on blood platelets.



Dr. Folts and his colleagues have found that two six-ounce glasses of red
wine daily significantly reduce blood plate adhesion. They have also found
that drinking six six-ounce glasses of grape juice a day will produce the
same results. Grape juice is made without the seed and stem extraction than
wine.



Dr. Folts notes that red wine is high in the bioflavonoids quercetin and
rutin. Dr. Leroy Casey of Cornell University has correlated the concentration
of the bioflavonoid “resveratrol” with wine’s protective effect.
However, he finds more resversatol in concord grape juice than in most wines.



Sorry to digress, but I felt that some readers might like additional comment
on this controversal subject.



Are your research findings on alcohol, ADIS and nutrition reaching practicing
physicians and the public?



Watson: I am not sure, but I hope so. My message can be succinctly
summarized. First, prevention is the key to health, so avoid situations
that increase risk of HIV infection, immune damage (alcohol and drug use),
and initiation of cancer (tobacco, sunlight, AIDS). Then take aggressive
steps to promote health by increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables,
and supplementation with antioxidant vitamins.



Passwater: Amen! Again science has backed my mother’s teachings.



Passwater: What will we study next?



Watson: We will continue to try to optimize health for the aging
adult. That will include continued investigations into the benefits of multiple
antioxidant supplementation on immune and other systems. In addition, we
are just beginning to investigate DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone). This is
a hormone that declines as we age simultaneously with development of immune
dysfunction and increased cancer growth in the older and elderly populations.
There is evidence in mice that DHEA supplementation will restore age-damaged
immune systems which we are testing in older humans and mice.



All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
to © Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).



]]>
23577
Oxygen Radicals, Pro-oxidants and Antioxidant Nutrients https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/oxygen-radicals-pro-oxidants-and-antioxidant-nutrients/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=oxygen-radicals-pro-oxidants-and-antioxidant-nutrients Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:02:31 +0000 https://healthy.net/2019/08/26/oxygen-radicals-pro-oxidants-and-antioxidant-nutrients/ Professor Lester Packer, Ph.D. is the Director of the Membrane Bioenergetics Group and Professor of Molecular Biology at the University of California
at Berkeley. His distinguished career in teaching and research has included
appointments at Dartmouth Medical School and the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical School. Dr. Packer is also a Faculty Senior Scientist in the Energy
and Environment Division of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.



Dr. Packer is the author of about 40 books and about 400 scientific research
articles. He is the Executive Editor of “Archives of Biochemistry and
Biophysics,” and serves on the editorial boards of “Free Radical
Biology and Medicine,” “Journal of Applied Nutrition” and
“Journal of Optimal Nutrition.”



Dr. Packer’s research interests include the role of vitamin E at the membrane
and cell level, nutritional and physiological studies in animal and human
exercise, and studies of vitamin E in the skin.



As most of you know, I have been working with free radicals since the 1960’s.
At the NNFA annual meeting in Nashville, I was asked to speak on the effects
of exercise-induced free radicals and the increased need for antioxidant
nutrients. The leading researcher in this field is Professor Lester Packer,
Ph.D. of the University of California at Berkeley. I have been following
Dr. Packer’s free radical research since 1971, and his free radical and
exercise research since 1984, but in June, I had the opportunity to discuss
his recent research with him in detail while horseback riding with Dr. William
Pryor and Dr. Packer in Montana.



Passwater: First of all, congratulations of receiving the
1992 VERIS Award for your significant contributions in clinical applications
of vitamin E. What got you interested in this line of research?



Packer: Well, thank you. There were a number of things that
influenced me. Looking back on it , maybe I didn’t have much choice. I had
been exposed to vitamin E research and there were some interesting questions
that piqued my curiosity. For example, why was it so difficult to induce
vitamin E deficiency in adult animals and not difficult in young animals?
That was a curious thing.



I knew of the interesting antioxidant functions of vitamin E because of
the pioneering work of Dr. Al Tappel and many others. So I had that background
information. This antioxidant research was emerging at the time I was doing
mu Post Doctoral studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Al Tappel
was doing research there while on Sabbatical leave from the University of
California at Davis. I had a chance to work with him on vitamin E’s antioxidant
actions, and I became interested in how vitamin E protected membranes against
damage.



Another motivating factor was the idea that vitamin E was actually discovered
at the University of California in Berkeley in this very same building in
which I was doing my research, by Dr. Herbert Evans in 1922. His legacy
was around when I came here and joined the faculty. So that was another
motivating factor.



So I became curious to work with vitamin E. There were a number of things
that happened and lines converged.



Passwater: How fortuitous for everyone. It looks like you
were pre-ordained to research vitamin E. Dr. Packer, you like to call oxygen
“our dangerous friend.” Most people are aware only of the need
for oxygen. Would you elaborate on the dangerous side of the oxygen cycle?



Packer: The fact that oxygen can be toxic has been known for
a century. Pasteur killed certain organisms with oxygen. Evidence has been
building that there are toxic products from oxygen that participate in reactions
that accelerate aging and age-related diseases.



What caught my interest was that the chronic damage from oxygen toxicity
was not a direct concentration effect like that of a poison, but that the
damage was greater than what one would expect from just the number of oxygen
molecules involved. Oxygen metabolism produces side products, called oxygen
free radicals, that in turn multiply the damage of the original oxygen molecule.
These oxygen free radicals perpetuate many other free radicals setting off
a chain of damaging reactions. This damage is at the molecular and cellular
levels.



This damage, rather than being overtly toxic, is eventually expressed as
accelerated aging or diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis or cataracts.



These species of oxygen that arise and are free to react are the so-called
oxygen free radicals. A free radical can be defined as an atom or molecule
that has one or more unpaired electrons.



Passwater: What are the most harmful oxygen radicals and how
harmful are they?



Packer: Some species of oxygen-formed free radicals are not
so dangerous, but others are more dangerous. The harm done by oxygen radicals
depends on the amounts, where they are formed and the biological system
involved.



Actually, the Oxygen molecule itself, a molecule consisting of two oxygen
atoms, is a bi-radical. But, curiously, molecular oxygen — which is actually
two free radicals united — is not particularly dangerous because the electronic
spins of the unpaired electrons happen to be in the same direction.
If oxygen’s unpaired electrons were spinning in opposite directions,
oxygen would be a very reactive radical. So because of that, oxygen itself
is not a very dangerous radical.



But, oxygen can give rise to other active oxygen free radicals like superoxide.
Superoxide is a common oxygen radical. Superoxide is merely an oxygen molecule
to which an electron has been added. This electron may be added by a variety
of ways. A common way in which this may happen is when some reduced metal
— such as iron or copper — might donate an electron to oxygen, thereby
making superoxide.



Also, the mitochondria in our cells contain a series of enzymes and other
catalysts known as the respiratory electron transport chain that convert
food components and oxygen into energy and water. However, there are some
components of our respiratory chain that are able to be oxidized and donate
electrons to oxygen to make superoxide.



This respiratory chain should be a nice oxygen cycle and everything should
be fine. The problem arises because there’s a slip in the process. Occasionally
an extra electron is added to the oxygen to make it into a free radical;
then there are intermediate steps in the reduction of oxygen that eventually
may lead back to producing water, but along the way we form some potentially
dangerous species.



The superoxide radical is one of the free radicals that is very commonly
produced during metabolism, but there are others.



Passwater: Yes, oxygen forms an unique molecule. Back in what
seems a lifetime ago, during the late 1950’s and 1960’s — in my days of
molecular spectroscopy, fluorescence spectrophotometry and quantum mechanics
— I was intrigued with the fact that most organic compounds exist in nature
in an electronic state called “the singlet state,” but because
of oxygen’s unique spin characteristics molecular oxygen normally exists
in the “triplet state.”



When oxygen absorbs photons of energy and is transformed to the first electronic
state, it can then fairly readily decay into its lowest excited electronic
state, which for oxygen is the singlet state. Where it can persist and do
harm. I want to talk about singlet oxygen with you in more detail later,
and I also want to discuss the role of iron in producing the superoxide
radical, and in the studies linking stored iron in the body with heart disease
and cancer, but for now lets get back to the various types of oxygen radicals.
We hear a lot about the superoxide radical which our body deactivates with
the enzyme, superoxide dismutase. What other oxygen free radicals should
we be concerned with?



Packer: Notice in the oxygen cycle that superoxide
can be converted into a hydroperoxide. Hydroperoxides are not very reactive
unless they are reduced by free iron or copper ions, in which case they
are transformed into hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl radicals are quite reactive.
They can be produced at an enormous rate and they persist sufficiently long
to damage proteins, as well as fats. Fats are easy to damage by oxygen-radical
attack. Fats can become free radicals called lipid peroxides (hydroperoxides
of fatty acids). These radicals are not oxygen radicals. Lipid peroxides
can in turn, damage proteins, but hydroxyl radicals, which are oxygen cycle
radicals, can directly damage proteins.



Proteins can be cross-linked together which will impair their functional
activity. Free radical cross-linking damage to DNA may impair its ability
to open up to express genes. Enzyme function would also be impaired.



The body has enzymes which can repair much of the damage to proteins, but
when these enzymes become damaged themselves, repair processes are compromised.



Passwater: How can oxygen radicals do so much damage?



Packer: If a large amount of oxygen radicals and reactive
oxygen species produced by an acute exposure to oxidants occurs, then the
endogenous antioxidant defense mechanisms may be overwhelmed. They will
just simply not be able to cope with a load of free radicals, and this will
initiate free radicals into crucial biological molecules, small molecules
and macromolecules which can be propagated, leading to molecular damage,
cross-linking and inactivation of function activity.



Passwater: What are our defenses against these oxygen radicals?



Packer : These defenses include antioxidant substances and
enzymes specifically designed to quench radicals. These substances, including
vitamin E, ubiquinones (coenzyme Q), carotenoids, thiols such as glutathione,
thiol enzymes, hydroperoxidases and superoxide dismutase (SOD), also have
other functions.



Passwater: How much of these antioxidant nutrients — vitamins
A, C, E, beta-carotene, selenium and sulfur-containing compounds — do we
need, and can we get the optimal amount in our diet?



Packer: This is a very difficult question to answer. Obviously,
it depends on lifestyle and on many unanswered questions that are yet to
emerge from epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Nevertheless, the
circumstantial evidence is accumulating rapidly, that higher levels of antioxidants,
certain types at least, have health benefits. Also, keep in mind that there
are dangers because every antioxidant can be a pro-oxidant.



Furthermore, certain nutrients, selenium, for example, may have an optimum
concentration, but its concentration at which it optimally benefits biological
systems is in a narrow range of concentration and if this is exceeded, toxicity
can occur. Hence, we must have an understanding of the amounts and balance
of dietary nutrients.



Passwater: How does vitamin E stop free radical propagation?



Packer: Vitamin E quenches radicals, particularly lipid (fat)
radicals in hydrophobic parts (areas free of water) of our body. This is
usually in lipid membranes or lipoproteins. This is because vitamin E is
only soluble in lipid, and therefore, that is the major place that it can
exert it’s protection. It quenches oxygen free-radicals of lipids, such
as lipid peroxyl radicals and lipid alkoxyl radicals. In the process, vitamin
E becomes a free radical itself. One might ask, what does one gain by this?
What one gains is that vitamin E, when it becomes a radical, is less reactive
(a longer living radical), and thus, is not so dangerous to the biological
system. Because it has a longer lifetime, a vitamin E radical can be regenerated
back to normal vitamin E.



Passwater: Vitamin E seems to be a very dynamic molecule.



Packer: This is what I mean by being regenerated. Vitamin
C, for example, can react with a vitamin E radical to regenerate vitamin
E into its natural antioxidant potent form. In this process, vitamin C becomes
a free radical (the semiascorbyl radical). This vitamin C radical can be
regenerated in turn by thiols (a class of sulfur-containing compounds) such
as glutathione. Reduced glutathione — that is the tripeptide form of glutathione
having an intact sulfhydryl group — is the cell’s primary preventive antioxidant,
present in cells in concentrations as high as one to ten millimolars. When
reduced glutathione neutralizes harmful oxidative radicals, it becomes oxidized
in such a manner that two reduced glutathione molecules are joined together
via a disulfide bond.



It should be noted that vitamin C is present in cells in micromolar quantities
(a thousandth of that of glutathione), and vitamin E in nanomolar (a millionth
of that of glutathione). So there is a hierarchy of interactions between
the various redox-based antioxidants. Chemical reactions occur that lead
to the regeneration, but there are also enzyme-dependent mechanisms and
pathways that we have identified in recent years that are very important
in regenerating vitamin E. So, vitamin E is really a dynamic molecule, which
is in equilibrium with much of the cells of redox metabolism.



Passwater: How do water-soluble antioxidants protect vitamin
E which is fat-soluble?



Packer: Vitamin C appears to be able to react directly with
the vitamin E radical in the membrane, exposed to the surface of membranes
or lipoproteins. Glutathione does not seem to be able to have such a protective
effect, but rather seems to act through keeping vitamin C in its potent
active form (reduced vitamin C). Perhaps figure 3 will help show this inter-relationship.



Passwater: You mentioned vitamin E and vitamin C cycles, how
about beta-carotene, coenzyme Q-10 and thiols?



Packer: Well, as I was saying, there are enzyme-dependent
pathways for regeneration of vitamin E. Coenzyme Q (or ubiquinone 10 or
ubiquinone 50, as it is sometimes designated), which is in natural membranes,
seems to act as a back-up system, reducing vitamin E radicals and thus,
sparing vitamin E and keeping vitamin E efficient. Although the reduced
form of coenzyme Q (ubiquinols) are antioxidants in their own right, they
do not appear to be nearly as effective directly as vitamin E. Hence, this
system of electron transport between coenzyme Q and vitamin E seems to be
important.



Thiols, such as glutathione and alpha-lipoic acid, in their reduced form,
seem to act primarily by regenerating vitamin C. Alpha-lipoic acid is a
somewhat unique naturally-occurring antioxidant in that it is a small with
both water-soluble and lipid-soluble characteristics (dioctanoic acid),
and can directly interact with lipoproteins or membranes to afford protection
by acting as an antioxidant to quench oxygen radicals such as superoxide
and peroxyl radicals.



Passwater: Where is your research leading you now? Do you
believe that we will learn of additional roles and actions for the antioxidant
nutrients?



Packer: Well, we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg because
it is not only understanding how natural antioxidants act, it is being able
to appreciate the interactions that exist between antioxidants. Each antioxidant
does not act on its own, but often antioxidants have interconnected actions,
which determine the antioxidant potency of the body or parts of the body.



In this regard, one area of great interest currently is whether or not carotenoids
such as beta-carotene, directly interact with other lipid antioxidants such
as vitamin E. Vitamin E is a redox-based antioxidant and carotenoids are
not. Do they interact in an additive or synergistic way? In this case, the
answer is not clear. But, in the case of the redox-based antioxidants like
the thiols, the vitamin C system and the vitamin E antioxidant cycle, there
is clearly a synergism that exists when all three components are interacting
with one another. We are pursuing studies with in vivo and in
vitro
model systems seeking to elucidate the pathways and potency of
these antioxidant cycles.



Passwater: Thank you for mentioning the synergism of vitamin
E, vitamin C and the thiols. It’s my favorite subject. By the way, speaking
of synergism, what supplements do you take?



Packer: I take several supplements including natural carotenoids,
vitamin E, alpha-lipoic acid and vitamin C.



Passwater: Earlier, we discussed the basic oxygen-radical/antioxidant
relationship and its role in health. You mentioned that iron can donate
an electron to oxygen to produce a superoxide radical. Many people are concerned
about the possible implications of a recent Finnish report suggesting that
heart disease may be linked to the amount of iron found in the blood in
the form of ferritin. (1) Many people are concerned that dietary iron can
increase blood ferritin levels, and thus, increase their risk for heart
disease. Some physicians have singled out iron-containing supplements as
being dangerous. In fact, the newspaper reports quoted several physicians
who saw a chance to gang up on all vitamin and mineral supplements.



What do we know about the dangers of the dietary pro-oxidants such as iron?



Packer: Free iron, that is, iron that has been momentarily
liberated from iron-containing proteins can convert mildly reactive oxygen
radicals into highly reactive oxygen radicals, such as hydroxyl radicals.




A research led by Dr. Jukka Salonen of the University of Kuopio recently
reported their study of blood ferritin levels and heart disease incidence
in Circulation [1]. The study is an epidemiological study. Such studies
do not prove anything — they just verify associations rather causal or
not. And, one such study is in no way definitive.



What intrigues me about the study is that although the association was reported
to be with the amount of ferritin in the blood, there was also mention of
a correlation with dietary iron. However, this data is not presented in
the tables or discussed in further detail.



Passwater: OK, lets hold off the discussion of how dietary
iron may possibly be related to heart disease, and review the background
or iron transport for our readers. As I discuss in my book “Trace elements,
hair analysis and nutrition,” iron, in contrast with most other minerals,
is regulated in the body primarily by absorption rather than by excretion.
[2] A number of studies have confirmed the critical importance of the gastrointestinal
tract in controlling the total body iron stores. [3,4,5] Urine contains
very small amounts of iron, and the only iron found in feces is that unabsorbed
from the diet.



Not all forms of iron are absorbed equally. Normally, six to ten percent
of the iron in food is absorbed, but iron-deficient individuals can absorb
more than 15 percent. Persons with iron-deficiency anemia may absorb 50
to 60 percent of the same iron. [2] The iron status of the individual, the
individual’s red blood cell production rate, and other factors regulate
the amount of iron transported across the intestinal mucosa.



Packer: Yes, and keep in mind that even in people who eat
a lot of iron, there is not much free iron in the body. People can overload
with iron, but little of the excess iron is found not contained in storage
ferritin. Even in Africans who consume a lot of iron because they cook in
and eat from iron pots, have little free iron in their bodies. They have
abnormal quantities of iron in their livers and spleens stored in organelles
that have developed that even have membranes around them. The body has sequestered
the iron in these deposits.



Passwater: Speaking of peoples from other countries, that
reminds me that there is a significant genetic component to iron storage
— aside from those having a genetic-defect disease. The control of ferritin
and the plasma-membrane receptor for transferrin is by genetic expression.
The balance between these proteins regulates iron availability, since the
transferrin receptor is required for the uptake of iron, and ferritin is
necessary for storage of any iron temporarily in excess of immediate need.



Packer: It can be expected that a lot of individual variability
in the dynamics and regulation of iron storage occurs in people through
environmental influences and genetic



Passwater: The body produces ferritin, a protein that binds
iron, primarily to store iron in cells. [2] The iron stored in ferritin
is in the form of ferric oxide complex which is surrounded by the apoferritin
protein shell. For every microgram of ferritin in the blood, there is thought
to be about eight milligrams of ferritin stored in cells.



Normally, in healthy adult women, there are 20 to 120 micrograms of ferritin
in each liter of blood, with the “mean” value being 46 micrograms/liter.
For healthy adult men, the range normally is from 30 to 300 micrograms per
liter of blood, with the “mean” value being 127 micrograms/liter.



There is also another compound, called hemosiderin, that functions as an
iron-storage compound.



Iron carried in the bloodstream is mostly carried in a protein called transferrin.
Normally, in the typical healthy adult, there are 200 to 400 milligrams
of transferrin in each deciliter of blood.



Packer: The iron in the body is also incorporated into enzymes,
hemoglobin and myoglobin. But, when these proteins breakdown at the end
part of their normal “lifespan,” they release iron into the blood.




Free “reduced” iron is dangerous because it is readily available
to react, therefore, the body goes to great effort to trap free iron ions.
The body binds iron to transferrin and carries it in the blood to the cells
where the iron is transferred to ferritin for storage in the cells.



The potential danger always lies in releasing the iron from proteins. Not
only from transferrin and ferritin, but from the hemoglobin of red blood
cells. The release of iron can occur through tissue injury. As an example,
when you are running on a hard payment, you crush red blood cells every
time your foot hits the ground, usually some iron leaves the red blood cells.
Iron can also be released due to some disease processes.



If you have more free iron around because there is more iron-containing
proteins available to be damaged, then it is logical to expect more iron-catalyzed
free-radical production. Therefore, this report is not illogical, and more
studies should be made.



Passwater: Ferritin was chosen as the risk marker in the Finnish
study because it usually correlates to total iron stores in the body.
However, blood ferritin levels can be raised by inflammation, infection,
chronic disease, thalassemia, liver disease or Hodgkin’s disease. So a study
of the association between ferritin and heart disease must determine if
heart disease raises blood ferritin, if some confounding factor increases
both ferritin and heart disease, or if increased ferritin levels increase
the heart disease incidence. An epidemiological study does not determine
which does what, but if additional epidemiological studies support the Finnish
study, much effort should be devoted to laboratory and clinical studies.



Epidemiological studies by themselves are not unlike associating umbrellas
usage with the incidence of rain — while there is a high correlation between
seeing umbrellas and having rain — it is not the umbrellas that cause the
rain.



Packer: What we can look at in the laboratory is the role
that oxidative stress can play in releasing iron from its protein carriers.
In a book that I edited, Drs. Barry Halliwell and John Gutteridge discuss
how superoxide radicals liberate iron from ferritin and thus promote lipid
peroxidation. [6] Also, it has been reported that an in vitro study
showed that a combination of physiological concentrations of hydrogen peroxide
and hemin induces rapid peroxidation which releases free iron. There are
other studies supporting a possible synergism between oxidative stress,
free iron and oxidized LDL. Oxidized LDL is now thought to be a major factor
in promoting atherosclerosis.



Passwater: There are other preliminary studies and observations
that seem to fit this thesis. The consensus is that women are protected
from heart disease until after menopause by estrogen. However, as Dr. Jerome
Sullivan of V. A. Medical Center in Charleston has pointed out, this protection
could arise from the fact that women have low iron ferritin due to their
monthly losses.



[7] Neither hypothesis has as yet been well supported and either could be
correct or both may be incorrect.



Support is found in other common observations that could be given different
interpretations to exploit the possible iron link. Aspirin is thought to
reduce heart attacks because it reduces the tendency for blood to clot,
and thus may reduce the probability of clots from blocking the flow in coronary
arteries which is what happens during a heart attack. A new interpretation
could be that aspirin may be effective because it causes gastrointestinal
bleeding, and this blood loss reduces body iron levels.



Some have presented a new interpretation of an old line of thinking to extend
this new observation — as yet unconfirmed — to explain a suggested link
between red meat and heart disease — not by red meat’s saturated fat content,
but by its iron content.



Other so-called associations have been reported, but they too are still
weak at this time. As an example, there have been reports that carcinogens
fed to laboratory rats on a high iron diet have increased numbers of tumors.
[8] This is not a test of body stores, nor necessarily of dietary iron.
The effect could be merely due to the fact that ionic iron in the diet reacted
with the carcinogen to make it more potent.



In another study, men with high iron stores were more likely to develop
cancer during the ten years of the study than men with lower iron stores.
However, iron stores were not linked to dietary iron intakes, “which
suggests cancer-prone individuals either exhibit altered absorption or metabolism
of iron.”
[9] Undoubtedly, this will rapidly become a fertile
area for research. You have already done some research with iron, free-radicals
and heart disease. What have you looked at?



Packer: In studies that we have done in vitro, where
iron is studied during ischemia reperfusion of the isolated animal heart,
iron catalyzes oxygen damage to the heart tissues. However, if we bind the
iron to a sequestering agent in a specific manner, iron is not available
to catalyze oxygen reactions and free radical damage is minimized and this
is accompanied by greater recovery of the hearts in vitro in terms
of mechanical activity (contractility).



Passwater: Singlet oxygen — an excited electronic state of
oxygen — contains more energy than the “ground” state or normal
molecular oxygen. When this excess energy of singlet oxygen is discharged,
damage to body molecules can occur. Although this is not free-radical damage,
it is another way in which oxygen can be “our dangerous friend.”



Is singlet oxygen a major problem to the body?



Packer: In plants where photosynthesis is occurring, this
is a major problem. The photons of ultraviolet energy are being absorbed
in the process of converting water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and food.
Plants manufacture carotenoids such as beta-carotene to protect against
singlet oxygen by converting it back to normal oxygen.



In the human the action of some enzymes produces singlet oxygen in the dark
regions of the body such as myeloperoxidase of macrophages. However, it’s
not known whether this species of activated oxygen is damaging in people.



Passwater: You mentioned that beta-carotene can protect against
singlet oxygen. How about lycopene and vitamin E. Vitamin E can quench singlet
oxygen through an essentially (99%) physical process (Stevens et al, 1974),
is this a meaningful action for vitamin E in the human?



Packer: Vitamin E can quench singlet oxygen, although not
as efficiently as carotenoids — but since we don’t know how significant
singlet oxygen is for human health — this may be a mute question.



Passwater: Thank you for helping to provide a foundation for
the understanding of antioxidant nutrients, pro-oxidants and free-radical
pathology. I wish our readers can have the opportunity to attend one of
your lectures, as you are the most dynamic scientific lecturer I’ve ever
witnessed.



REFERENCES

    1. High stored iron levels are associated with excess risk ofmyocardial
    infarction in Eastern Finnish men.Salonen, Jukka T.; Nyyssonen, Kristiina;Korpela,
    Heikki; et al.Circulation 86:803-11 (1992)

    2. Trace elements, hair analysis and nutrition.Passwater, Richard A. and
    Cranton, Elmer M.Keats Publishing, New Canaan, CT (1983)

    3. Bothwell, T. H. and Charlton, R. W.Annu. Rev. Med. 21:145-6 (1970)

    4. Forth, W. and Rummel, W.Physiol. Rev. 53:724-92 (1973)

    5. Linder, M. C. and Munro, H. N. J. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp.Biol. 36:2017-23
    (1977)

    6. Role of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in humandisease: An overview.Halliwell,
    B. and Gutteridge, JMCin: Packer, Lester and Glazer, A. N. (eds)Methods
    in Enzymology, vol. 186, pp 1-85, Academic Press,San Diego, (1990)

    7. The iron paradigm of ischemic heart disease.Sullivan, Jerome Amer. Heart
    J. 17:1177-88 (1989)

    8. Iron and the risk of cancer.Stevens, R. G.Med. Oncol. Tumor Pharmacother.
    7(2-3):177-81 (1990)

    9. Iron: Health-enhancing or cancer promoting?Somer, ElizabethNutr. Rept.
    42 (June 1992)




All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
by © Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).



]]>
23578
How Antioxidant Nutrients Protect Against Heart Disease https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/how-antioxidant-nutrients-protect-against-heart-disease-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-antioxidant-nutrients-protect-against-heart-disease-2 Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:28:02 +0000 https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/how-antioxidant-nutrients-protect-against-heart-disease-2/ This article discusses the very latest findings on how antioxidant nutrients
prevent heart disease, and then forms the background for a series of articles
that explain in lay terms, “how” this occurs. An important point
of my new book, The New Supernutrition, is that heart disease is
not caused so much by what you eat as by what you don’t eat. [1]
It is difficult for the average person to understand that the nutrients
such as beta-carotene, vitamins A, C and E, and the mineral selenium are
more important to heart health than how much cholesterol is in their diet.
Merely presenting the evidence is not sufficient as the public needs some
easy-to-understand mental images so they can grasp the concept.



From time to time, I have pointed out current research showing that antioxidant
nutrients protect against heart disease. However, by the time I cover the
research findings, I have no space left for a scientifically correct —
but plain English — explanation of how these nutrients provide their protection.
I have had to be content with using general descriptions of how antioxidants
prevent the free-radical damage that causes heart disease.



This has served well for explaining how the nutrients prevent the damage
to the artery linings that starts the heart disease process. However, since
the public has been taught an oversimplified — and incorrect — concept
concerning cholesterol, the action of free radicals on the lipoproteins
that transport cholesterol in the bloodstream is hard for some to visualize.



Now I have been dealing with this “communications” problem for
more than twenty five years. The terms “free radicals” and “lipoproteins”
have become buzzwords that have helped many understand some pretty complicated
biochemical processes. The first time that the term “free radical”
was introduced to the general public was in an article about my 1960’s research
which appeared in the Ladies Home Journal . [2] Prevention
brought my free-radical research to the attention of the lay nutrition audience
in 1971. [3] And, I was first to describe high-density lipoprotein (HDL)
— the “good” cholesterol — and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
— the “bad” cholesterol — in my 1977 book, Supernutrition
For Healthy Hearts
. [4] But now it is time to discuss the structures
of lipoproteins and lipoprotein receptors and the role of antioxidant nutrients.



More “New” Evidence

So much for the introduction to this series. By the way, there are so many
new and interesting topics to write about, that I won’t present the entire
series in consecutive installments. One thing I have learned from lecturing
is to make my point early or I will lose my audience. I often begin my lectures
with my point, which is opposed to the general practice of building up to
the point. This is how I will present this series. I will now present the
conclusion, and leave the background and explanations for the later sections.



Some of the high-lights are:


    1) Several new studies show that antioxidant vitamins prevent heart disease.



    2) We now know how HDL removes cholesterol from the interior of a
    cell, even though the HDL receptor is attached to the cell membrane.



    3) Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is one of the best markers of heart disease risk,
    and it in turn is controlled by vitamin C.



    4) We have identified a molecular “grappling hook,” a peptide,
    that LDL sinks into the free-radical damaged artery linings.




First, lets take a brief look at the new studies that show antioxidant nutrients
prevent heart disease.



Antioxidant Nutrients Prevent Heart Disease

My research in 1973 showed that dietary cholesterol didn’t cause heart disease.
[5] For those who are still skeptical, please read the confirming studies
in the thirteen cited references. [6-18] In 1974, I conducted an epidemiological
study that showed vitamin E protected against the artery damage that leads
to plaque (the so-called cholesterol deposits) and heart disease. [19-21]



In my study, where persons consumed 400 IU or more daily of vitamin E for
more than two years, their rate of heart disease was significantly lower
than normal. The amount of heart disease in any age group decreased proportionally
with the length of time that vitamin E had been taken. In fact, the length
of time was more important than quantity after a minimum of 400 IU daily
was taken.



Several researchers, including Dr. William Hermann of the Methodist Hospital
in Houston and Dr. Staurt Hartz of Tufts University, have now reported that
vitamin E supplements raise HDL. [22] A 1987 study has found that 500 IU
of vitamin E daily for three months produces a significantly improved HDL
level, Apolipoprotein A level, and Apolipoprotein A to Apolipoprotein B
ratio. [23]



Vitamin C has also been shown to raise HDL significantly. [24]



And, of course, selenium has been shown to be protective. [25] Epidemiological
studies have shown that persons with low-selenium diets have two-to-three
times greater risk of heart disease than those eating selenium rich diets.
[26] In a clinical study, patients with blockage of all three coronary arteries
had low blood selenium levels, while those with high blood selenium levels
were healthy and free of coronary heart disease. [27] Strikingly, those
with one diseased coronary artery had the next highest blood selenium levels,
and those with two blocked coronary arteries had the second lowest blood
selenium levels.



The role of antioxidant nutrients is not just in preventing the artery damage
that leads to atherosclerotic plaques, but in protecting against the formation
of blood clots when blood is squeezed through plaque-narrowed arteries.
Vitamin E reduces the stickiness of blood. Sticky blood due to high blood
platelet adhesion is what causes blood to clot in the coronary arteries
resulting in heart attacks. [28] Dr. Rudolph Riemersa of the University
of Edinburgh in Scotland and Dr. Fred Gey of the University of Berne in
Switzerland have found that men with higher-than-average blood levels of
beta-carotene, vitamin C and vitamin E –particularly vitamin E — were
less likely to have clinical symptoms of heart disease than those with lower-than-average
levels of these nutrients. [29]



Two months ago, I discussed the Harvard Physicians’ Health Study, in which
approximately 22,000 male physicians took either beta-carotene or a placebo
alternating with either aspirin or a placebo. Physicians who took the 50
milligrams (xx,000 USP) of beta-carotene every other day had about half
as many heart attacks, strokes, cardiac arrests, bypass operations or angioplasties
to remove embolisms. Among a sub-group of 333 physicians with a previous
history of heart disease, those taking a combination of aspirin and beta-carotene
suffered no heart attacks in six years of study! [30]



Lipoprotein(a)

As for LDL and HDL relationships, a better marker for heart disease risk
is the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. There is no correlation between Lp(a) levels
and cholesterol plasma levels, and in heart patients having normal blood
cholesterol levels, the only risk factor found is elevated Lp(a) or decreased
vitamin C and vitamin E levels.



Drs. Matthias Rath and Linus Pauling have published a revealing paper linking
heart disease, Lp(a) and vitamin C deficiency. Lp(a) shares with LDL its
lipid and apoprotein composition — mainly apoprotein B-100 (apo B), but
the unique thing about Lp(a) is an additional glycoprotein, apoprotein(a)
or apo(a). This difference will be discussed in a later installment of this
series.



Lp(a) levels are elevated in heart disease patients. Lp(a) blood levels
above 30 milligrams per deciliter of blood doubles the risk of coronary
heart disease. If, in addition, LDL is elevated,the risk is increased by
a factor of five. There is no correlation between Lp(a) levels and blood
cholesterol levels. In heart disease patients having normal blood cholesterol
levels, the only risk factor is found to be elevated Lp(a).



Lp(a) can be normalized by vitamin C. [31] Another 1990 report showed that
vitamin C reduces risk for heart disease. [32]



Oxidized LDL and Antioxidants

As discussed in last month’s column, the initiation of atherosclerosis results
from injury to the layer of endothelial calls which normally form the luminal
surface of blood vessel walls.



Such injury disturbs local vascular homeostasis resulting in platelet deposition,
aggregation and release of factors which promote smooth muscle proliferation
and eventual fibrosis. The damaged endothelium also becomes permeable to
lipoproteins, particularly oxidized LDL and macrophages which invade the
site of injury, accumulate cholesterol as cholesterylester, and develop
into foam cells and then fatty streaks.



Eventually, a rather complicated structure, the atherosclerotic plaque,
develops consisting of lipids (fats) complex carbohydrates, blood, blood
products, fibrous tissue and calcium deposits. A raised blood LDL-cholesterol
concentration has been recognized as a risk factor for heart disease because
it appears to be the donor of cholesterol deposited in the atherosclerotic
plaque. Raised LDL is associated more with heart disease incidence than
is blood cholesterol level, but HDL/LDL ratio correlates better, and better
yet, lipoprotein(a). The roles of these cholesterol carriers will become
clearer in later installments of this series.



The accumulation of LDL-borne cholesterol by macrophages is something of
a paradox, however, since the cell has few LDL-receptors and is able to
down regulate the receptor number when the LDL-cholesterol concentration
is increased. The resolution of this paradox may lie in one of two closely
related explanations. The first explanation is that the oxidation of LDL
produces a molecule which is no longer recognized by the LDL receptor but
by a non-regulated scavenger receptor. The macrophages can then accumulate
cholesterol from this oxidized LDL.



The second explanation is that oxidized LDL is attacked by the macrophages
and the macrophages are unable to digest the LDL particles and “die”.
The fat-filled “dead” macrophages accumulate and injure the arterial
lining resulting in plaque.



Antioxidants can prevent or slow the accumulation of cholesterol that is
due to the modification or oxidation of LDL. Antioxidant nutrients inhibit
the oxidation of human LDL. The synergistic protection of vitamins A and
C against LDL being oxidized has been shown. [33] Dr. K. Sato and colleagues
at the University of Tokyo has found that LDL is oxidized by a free radical
chain mechanism. Vitamin E halts this process within the fatty portions
of the LDL complex, while vitamin C is stops the free radical damage in
the watery medium. The two antioxidant vitamins act simultaneously and cooperatively
to reduce oxidation of LDL.



Dr. J. C. Fruchart and colleagues at the Pasteur Institute in Lille, France
found that when they gave volunteers with high LDL 1,000 IU of vitamin E
daily for two months, they produced fewer “dead” fat filled macrophages
and had lower blood cholesterol levels.



Antioxidant nutrients also protect the artery cell membranes lining the
arteries. A study at the University of Kentucky by Dr. B. Hennig showed
that when artery tissues were well-nourished with vitamin E, they were protected
from injury. [34] However, when they were vitamin E deficient, oxidative
stress caused many deleterious changes in the arteries. Related findings
have been reported by researchers at the Institute of Biochemical Science
in Italy. [35]



In the Harvard Physicians Health Study mentioned earlier, Dr. Gaziano noted
that beta-carotene discourages the formation of oxidized LDL, but there
is more to antioxidant protection than that. Dr. Daniel Steinberg of the
University of California at San Diego adds that “you’re dealing with
men in the study who have established atherosclerosis, so it may be that
oxidized LDL’s cytotoxicity is involved in thrombosis (clotting). Oxidized
LDL may be involved in fatty streak formation and precipitation of the coronary
event.” [36]





References

1. The New Supernutrition Passwater, Richard A.Pocket Books, NY (May 1991)

2. McGrady, Patrick Ladies Home Journal

3. Don’t Age Too Fast Kinderleher, Jane Prevention 23(12) 104-10 (Dec. 1971)

4. Supernutrition For Healthy Hearts Passwater, Richard A. Dial Press, NY
(1977)

5. Dietary Cholesterol Passwater, Richard A., Amer. Lab. 5(6): 10-22 (June
1973)

6. Oh, Suk Y. and Miller, Lorraine T. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 42(3) 421-31
(Sep. 1985)

7. Flaim, Evelyn, et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 34:1103-8 (June 1981)

8. Nutr. Rev. 43(9) 263-5 (Sep. 1985)

9. Keys, A., et al., Metabolism 14:759-65 (1965)

10. Kannell, William B. and Gordon, Tavia USDHEW Report 24 (1970)

11. Nichols, A. B., et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 29:1384-92 (1976)

12. Shekelle, R. B., et al., New Engl. J. Med. 304:65-70 (1981)

13. Drawber, Thomas R., et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 36:617-25 (Oct. 1982)

14. Porter, M. W., et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 30:490-5 (1977)

15. Slater, G., et al., Nutr. Rept. Internat. 14:249-52 (1976)

16. Kummerow, Fred A., et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 30:664-73 (1977)

17. Flynn, M. A., et al., Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 32:1051-7 (1979)

18. Hirshowitz, B., et al., Brit. J. Plastic Surg. 23:529 (1976)

19. Heart Study of 50- 59 Year Olds. Passwater, Richard A., Prevention
28 (5) 111- 115 (May 1976)

20. Heart Study of 60- 69 Year Olds. Passwater, Richard A. Prevention 28
(4) 107- 113 (Apr. 1976)

21. Heart Study of 70- 79 Year Olds. Passwater, Richard A., Prevention 28
(2) 61- 68 (Feb. 1976)

22. Hermann, W., Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 462 (1982)

23. Cloarec, M. J., et al., Israel J. Med. Sci. 23(8) 869-72 (Aug. 1987)

24. Bazzarre, T., Nutr. Rep. Internat. 33:711-20 91986)

25. Selenium and Cardiovascular disease. Oster, O. and Prellwitz, W., Biol.
Trace Elements Res.
24:91-103 (1990)

26. …. Lancet II 175 (1982)

27. …. Clin. Chem. 30:1171 (1984)

28. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-independent platelet aggregation by low
vitamin E concentration. Violi, F., et al., Atherosclerosis 82:247-52 (1990)

29. Fackelmann, K. A., Science News 23 (Jan. 12, 1991)

30. Gaziano, J. Michael, American Heart Association’s 63rd Scientific Sessions,
Dallas (November 1990)

31. Hypothesis: Lipoprotein(a) is a surrogate for ascorbate. Rath, M. and
Pauling, L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:6204-7 (1990)

32. Correlation of plasma ascorbic acid with cardiovascular risk factors.
Esk, C. et al., Clin. Res. 38:A747 (1990)

33. Free radical-mediated chain oxidation of low density lipoprotein and
its synergistic inhibition by vitamin E and vitamin C. Sato, K., et al.,
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 279:402-5 (1990)

34. Hennig, B., Internat. J. Vit. Nutr. Res. 59:273-9 (1989)

35. Del Boccio, G., et al., Atherosclerosis 81:127-35 (1990)

36. Bankhead, Charles D., Medical World News 12-3 (Jan. 1991)


All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
to Ricahard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.)

]]>
21691
Acetylcysteine and Glutathione: New Understandings about https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/acetylcysteine-and-glutathione-new-understandings-about-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=acetylcysteine-and-glutathione-new-understandings-about-2 Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:28:02 +0000 https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/acetylcysteine-and-glutathione-new-understandings-about-2/ Our understanding of the many nutritional and biochemical roles of glutathione
and its precursors is expanding rapidly at this time. We are learning how
the precursors to sulfur-containing peptides and amino acids are important
in keeping our bodies nourished, our immune systems healthy, and in protecting
us against cancer and heart disease.



Glutathione and cysteine have been important in my research for over thirty
years. Even before that, I believe that some pioneers in the health food
profession indirectly realized the importance of these compounds even though
they didn’t know about the specific compounds. When the “pioneers”
spoke so favorably of getting adequate “sulfur” in the diet, I
believe that they were really testifying to the importance of these sulfur-containing
compounds. Now, the interest in learning how sulfur-containing amino acids
and their precursors nourish the body is increasing.



Researchers are rushing to study the roles these nutrients to also discover
their role in halting the dreaded Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), breaking
up lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], detoxifying harmful chemicals, scavaging free
radicals and possibly protecting against some cancer processes.



I have discussed cysteine and glutathione several times before. Later in this article, I will discuss the role of glutathione
precursors and why they are more effective than glutathione itself in
AIDS patients . These non-fuel nutrients are nutritional accessory factors
that are normally produced in plants, man and other animals. Thus, they
have always been a part of the human diet.



Background

Glutathione plays several critical roles in the body. Its more important
roles are protecting cells and cellular components against oxidative stress
and in detoxification. My interest in glutathione and cysteine began in
the 1960’s when they were found to be protective against nuclear radiation.
I reasoned that the same mechanism of action would make them excellent free-radical
scavengers as well. [1]



NAC is produced in living organisms from the amino acid cysteine {two compounds that are involved in intracellular glutathione production are N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) and L-2-oxo-thiazolidine 4-carboxylate (Procysteine)}. Thus,
NAC is a natural sulfur-containing amino acid derivative found naturally
in foods and is a powerful antioxidant. These dual properties help repair
oxidative damage in the body. This has made this nutrient of special interest
to athletes for some time as heavy exercise increases oxidative damage in
the body. But the latest research interests are in AIDS and heart disease.



AIDS and Immunity

Now the biochemical and medical research communities have taken special
interest in this nutrient because of its importance in increasing intracellular
glutathione levels and other biochemical properties. Oral glutathione is
largely broken down in the digestive system into dipeptides and free amino
acids. [***] Although some glutathione is absorbed intact, it still must
cross the cell walls to serve many body needs. As will be seen later, HIV
infection decreases the transport of glutathione into cells, and as a result,
the immune system fails. Thus, even injections of glutathione fail to restore
intracellular glutathione levels in AIDS patients. (Later we will
discuss the evidence that shows that glutathione is well absorbed and transported
across cellular membranes of healthy persons.) NAC, on the other hand,
is well absorbed, readily passes through cellular membranes in AIDS patients,
and stimulates glutathione production within the cells. [2-7] Approximately ten percent of orally ingested NAC shows up in the blood.



Earlier research has suggested that NAC suppresses Human Immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) in infected cell cultures. [8-14] NAC is also of interest to
AIDS patients as it protects against some of the damage produced by radiation.
[15] AIDS patients undergoing radiotherapy for Kaposi’s syndrome may have
a double benefit from this nutrient.



Heart Disease

Another area of interest is that research has pinpointed a specific lipoprotein
called Lp(a) as one of the two most reliable indicators of heart disease
risk. The other reliable indicator is the level of vitamin E in the blood.
Lp(a) is a much more reliable indicator than blood cholesterol level, low
density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein or their ratios to each other.



Now recent research has found that NAC is the most effective nutrient known
to lower Lp(a) levels. NAC reduces Lp(a) by almost 70%. [16-19]



Immunity

NAC affects immunity via its role in intracellular glutathione production.
This role becomes critical when normal glutathione production pathways are
impaired, as for example, by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Eck
has shown that reduced intracellular glutathione is the “direct and
early consequence of retroviral infection.” [20]



Intracellular glutathione has a powerful influence on how well T- and B-lymphocyte
cells function. [20,21] In addition, intracellular glutathione availability
affects the production of phagocytes (macrophages, monocytes and
neutrophils).



NAC has been shown to block the AIDS virus (HIV) production in vitro, apparently
by increasing glutathione levels in HIV-infected cells. [14] In 1989, Dr.
Leonore Herzenberg told Associated Press writer Steve Wilson, “I am
really excited about this. Looking at the scientific evidence for what (NAC)
does, and the scientific evidence for how AIDS works, our guess is that
treatment with (NAC) may be quite good. But, until we get it tested in patients,
we won’t know if it will work.”



Detoxification

This food-factor is also gaining new interest because it protects against
toxins and has been widely used to treat bronchopulmonary diseases.



NAC detoxifies several poisons including acetaminophen and other drugs,
mercury, lead, cadmium, paraquat, urethane, aflatoxin and Escherichia coli.
NAC, cysteine and glutathione contain sulfur in the form of sulfhydryl groups.
Sulfhydryl groups directly react readily with many toxins, especially heavy
metals such as lead, mercury and cadmium. [22-25] Sulfhydryl groups also
help remove toxins indirectly via an enzyme system called the P-450 System.



Although NAC is a food component and a nutrient accessory factor, it is
also marketed as a drug with approved medical claims. NAC is approved for
use in bronchopulmonary diseases and to prevent liver damage from acetaminophen overdose. [14] Either NAC tablets or solutions
may be used to protect against acetaminophen overdose. [26-29] Normally,
the 20 percent solution is drank after dilution with a cola drink.



The Lancet reports that NAC is also effective in reducing the toxic effects
of carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and carbon monoxide. [10] NAC can also
reduce the side effects of drugs such as doxorubicin and ifosphamide. [10]




Mucolytic

NAC has been used for about thirty years to break up mucus in persons having
bronchopulmonary diseases including chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis,
asthma, sinusitis and pneumonia. [30] NAC helps reduce the viscosity of
mucus so that it may be more easily coughed up. [31] NAC accomplishes this
by converting the disulfide bonds of the mucoproteins into sulfhydryl bonds
and cleaving the mucoproteins into smaller molecules.



Several companies provide a 10 or 20 percent NAC solution as a nebulizer
spray (such as Bristol Laboratories’ Mucomyst TM), while others such as
Italy’s Zambon group provides NAC in tablet form.



Optimal Intake Ranges

NAC in normal food supplementation ranges is without known toxicity and
has been administered by physicians under supervision in doses of two to
four grams daily. Larger quantities used for treating acetaminophen overdoses
have produced adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal
symptoms. Rash, with or without mild fever, has been reported on rare occasions
with very large quantities. When administered via nebulizer, adverse effects
can include stomatitis, nausea and nasal irritation. Intravenous administration
could also produce edema and a rapid heart beat.



Ingestion of more than 150 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (that
is nine grams per day for a 132 pound person, twelve grams per day for a
176 pound person, or fifteen grams per day for a 220 pound person) may produce
toxic or other undesirable effects.





References




1. Human Aging ResearchPasswater, Richard A. and Welker, Paul A.Amer. Lab.
3(5):21-6 (May 1971)

2. Pharmokinetics of oral acetylcysteine.Rodenstein, D., DeCoster, A. and
Gazzaniga, A.Clin. Pharmacokin. 3:247-54 (1978)

3. Toxicological, pharmacokinetics and metabolic studies onacetylcysteine.Bonanomi,
L. and Gazzaniga, A.Eur. J. Respir. Dis. 61(Sup):45-51 (1980)

4. Clinical pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine.Borgstrom, L., Kagedal,
B. and Paulsen, O.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31:217-22 (1986)

5. Pharmokinetics and bioavailability of reduced and oxidizedN-acetylcysteine.Olsson,
B., et al.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmocol. 34:77-82 (1988)

6. Acetylcysteine: A drug that is much more than a mucokinetic.Ziment, I.Biomed.
Pharmacother. 42:513-20 (1988)

7. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral acetylcysteinein healthy
volunteers.De Caro, L., et al.Arzneim.-Forsch/Drug Res., 39:382 (1989)

8. Suppression of Cytokine-induced Human Immunodeficiency Virus(HIV) expression
by N-acetylcysteine (NAC), glutathione(GSH) and Glutathione monoester (GSE)Kinter,
Audrey L., et al.75th Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societiesfor
Experimental Biology, Atlanta, Georgia (April 21-5, 1991)J. FASEB 5(5) A1265
(1991)

9. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus expression inchronically
infected monocytic cells by glutathione,glutathione ester, and N-acetylcysteine.
Kalebic, Thea, et al.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88(3):986-90 (1991)

10. Thiol-based compounds may limit AIDS progression.CDC AIDS Weekly p3
(Feb. 25, 1991)

11. Cytokine-stimulated human immunodeficiency virus replicationis inhibited
by N-acetylcysteine.Roederer, M., et al.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:4884-8
(1990)

12. Reducing agents and AIDS – Why are we waiting?Turner, V. F.Med. J. Aust.
153/8, 502 (1990)

13. Mercaptoethanol and N-acetylcysteine enhance T-cell colonyformation
in AIDS and ARC. Wu, J., et al.Clin. Exp. Immunol. 77/1, 7-10 (1989)

14. AIDS – Drug therapy; Acetylcysteine research.Cooper, MikeCDC AIDS Weekly
p4 (Oct. 2, 1989)

15. Glutathione deficiency and radiosensitivity in AIDSpatients.Vallis,
K. A.The Lancet 337:918-9 (April 13, 1991)

16. Lipoprotein(a) reduction by N-acetylcysteine.Gavish, Dov and Breslow,
Jan L.The Lancet 337:203-4 (Jan. 26, 1991)

17. N-acetylcysteine and lipoprotein.Stalenhoef, A. F. H., et al.The Lancet
337:491 (1991)

18. AcetylcysteineEditorialThe Lancet 337(8749):1069-70 (May 4, 1991)

19. N-Acetylcysteine and immunoreactivity of lipoprotein(a).Scanu, Angelo
M.The Lancet 337:1159 (May 4, 1991)

20. Metabolic disorder as early consequence of SimianImmunodeficiency Virus
infection in Rhesus macaques.Eck, Hans-Peter, et al.Lancet 338:346-7 (Aug.
10, 1991)

21. Mercaptoethanol and N-acetylcysteine enhance T-cell colonyformation
in AIDS and ARC.Wu, J., Levy, E. M. and Black, P. H.Clin. Exp. Immunol.
77:7-10 (1989)

22. Clinical application for heavy metal-complexing potential ofN-acetylcysteine.Lorber,
A., et al.J. Clin. Pharmacol. 13:332-6 (1973)

23. Treatment of acute methylmercury ingestion byhemodialysis with N-acetylcysteine.Lund,
M. E., Clarkson, T. W. and Berlin, M.J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 22:31-49
(1984)

24. N-acetylcysteine therapy of acute heavy metal poisoning inmice.Henderson,
P., et al.Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 27:522-5 (1985)

25. Experimental chelation therapy in chromium, lead and boronintoxification
with N-acetylcysteine.Tong, T. G.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 83:142-7 (1986)

26. Mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine in the protectionagainst hepatotoxicity
of acetaminophen in rats in vivo.Lauterburg, B. H., Corcoran, G. B. and
Mitchell, J. R.J. Clin. Invest. 71:980-991 (1983)

27. Role of glutathione in prevention of acetaminophen-inducedhepatotoxicity
by N-acetyl-L-cysteine in vivo.Corcoran, G. B. and Wong, B. K.J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 238:54-61 (1986)

28. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on plasma cysteine andglutathione following
paracetamol administration.Burgunder, J. M., Varriale, A. and Lauterberg,
B. H.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 36:127-31 (1989)

29. Improvement by acetylcysteine of hemodynamics and oxygentransport in
fulminant hepatic failure.Harrison, Phillip M., et al.N. Engl. J. Med. 324(26):1852-7
(June 27, 1991)

30. Long-term oral acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis: Adouble-blind controlled
study.Multicenter Study GroupEur. J. Respir. Dis. 61(Sup.):93 (1980)

31. The reduction in vitro in viscosity of mucoproteinsolutions by a new
mucolytic agent, N-acetylcysteine.Sheffner, A. L.Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 106:288
(1963)

All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
by Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.)


]]>
21696
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): An Old Nutrient Attracts New Research https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/n-acetylcysteine-nac-an-old-nutrient-attracts-new-research-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=n-acetylcysteine-nac-an-old-nutrient-attracts-new-research-2 Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:28:02 +0000 https://healthy.net/2000/12/06/n-acetylcysteine-nac-an-old-nutrient-attracts-new-research-2/ In a previous articel, I discussed why AIDS researchers were excited
about two nutrients, Vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). While most Whole
Foods
readers know a great deal about the roles of vitamin C in nourishing
the body, some readers may not be all that familiar with the roles of the
sulfur-containing nutrients, such as NAC, in nourishing the body. Therefore,
I promised to provide more background on NAC in this article. [1]



Our understanding of the many nutritional and biochemical roles of sulfur-containing
nutrients is expanding rapidly at this time. We are learning more about
how glutathione and its sulfur-containing precursors are important in keeping
our bodies nourished, our immune systems healthy, and in protecting us against
cancer and heart disease.



Glutathione, cysteine, methionine, selenocysteine and selenomethionine have
been important in my research for over thirty years. Even before that, I
believe that some of the health pioneers indirectly realized the importance
of these compounds as a group, even though they didn’t understand much about
the roles of the individual compounds. When the “pioneers” spoke
so favorably of getting adequate “sulfur” in the diet, I believe
that they were really testifying to the importance of these sulfur-containing
nutrients. Not much has been said about them in “mainstream” nutrition,
but today, interest in learning how sulfur-containing nutrients nourish
the body is increasing.



Researchers are rushing to study the roles of these nutrients in halting
the dreaded Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), breaking up lipoprotein(a)
[Lp(a)], detoxifying harmful chemicals, scavaging free radicals and possibly
protecting against some cancer processes. Since these nutrients are normally
produced in plants, man and other animals, they have always been a part
of the human diet.



Background

Sulfur-containing nutrients play several critical roles in the body including
detoxification and protecting cells and cellular components against oxidative
stress. My interest in glutathione and cysteine began in the 1960’s when
they were found to be protective against nuclear radiation. I reasoned that
the same mechanism of action would make them excellent free-radical scavengers
as well. They did, and twenty-one years ago I reported that, “sulfhydryl
compounds that are excellent radiation protectors are also free-radical
scavengers, peroxide decomposers, catalysts of sulfhydryl-disulfide exchange,
and possibly can implement repair of damaged sites. Sulfhydryl compounds
and vitamin E also increase the body’s tolerance to selenium.” [2]



Today, NAC is of greater interest than glutathione itself. NAC is produced
in living organisms from the amino acid cysteine. Thus, NAC is a natural
sulfur-containing amino acid derivative found naturally in foods and is
a powerful antioxidant. [3,4] These dual properties help repair oxidative
damage in the body.



Both NAC and glutathione are well absorbed. [5-8] NAC is rapidly metabolized,
and only about ten percent of the amount consumed stays in the blood for
an appreciable time. [9] Much of the NAC is very rapidly consumed in producing
intracellular glutathione. However, even the thiol metabolites of NAC are
good antioxidants.



NAC readily crosses cell membranes, even in HIV-infected cells, whereas
glutathione does not enter into HIV-infected cells in adequate amounts.
[10-12] Even so, NAC does not seem to raise tissue or blood levels of glutathione
above the desired ranges. [9] Thus, the nutrient role of NAC is to help
maintain healthy levels of intracellular glutathione , especially
whenever a condition has limited glutathione production. This nutrient role
of maintaining optimal levels of essential body compounds is different from
“drug roles” in which body compounds are just elevated without
homeostasis or normal body regulation.



Exercise

Since NAC is a powerful antioxidant nutrient, it has been of special interest
to athletes for some time as heavy exercise increases oxidative damage in
the body. [13-15] But the latest research interests are in AIDS and heart
disease.



Heart Disease

A growing area of interest is that research has pinpointed a specific lipoprotein
called Lp(a) as one of the two most reliable indicators of heart disease
risk. [16-20] The other reliable indicator is the level of vitamin E in
the blood. [21] Lp(a) is a much more reliable indicator than blood cholesterol
level, low density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein or their ratios
to each other.



Diets and drugs designed to lower blood cholesterol levels do not lower
Lp(a) levels. Now recent research has found that NAC is the most effective
nutrient known to lower Lp(a) levels. NAC reduces Lp(a) by almost 70%. [22-25]
Lp(a) consists of a LDL particle attached to the large glycoprotein apo(a)
by one or more disulfide bonds. NAC breaks up the disulfide bonds by converting
each disulfide group into two sulfhydryl groups now in two separate compounds.



NAC also inhibits heart damage by preventing LDL from being oxidized and
by destroying free radicals produced after an infarction. [26-29]



Immunity and AIDS

NAC affects immunity via its role in intracellular glutathione production.
This role becomes critical when normal glutathione production pathways are
impaired, as for example, by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Eck
has shown that reduced intracellular glutathione is the “direct and
early consequence of retroviral infection.” [12]



Intracellular glutathione has a powerful influence on how well T- and B-lymphocyte
cells function . [12,30] In addition, intracellular glutathione
availability affects the production of phagocytes (macrophages,
monocytes and neutrophils). T-cells and B-cells are lymphocytes (white cells
that are the principal cells of lymph). B-cells produce antibodies and are
responsible for humoral response, while T-cells help produce antibodies,
secrete interferon and other lymphokines, and are responsible for cell-mediated
response. The phagocytes have the function of killing viruses, bacteria
and fungi.



Free radicals can impair the immune system and NAC can protect against free
radicals and enhance the immune system. [31-33]



As discussed in detail in the previous issue, NAC has been shown to block
the AIDS virus (HIV) production in vitro, apparently by increasing glutathione
levels in HIV-infected cells. [34-46] In the previous article, I also discussed
the synergism of NAC and vitamin C. Beside vitamin C reducing oxidized glutathione
back to free reduced (active) glutathione, vitamin C and NAC had complementary
actions to slow the replication of the AIDS virus.



I reported last month that in addition to NAC and vitamin C (especially
Ester-C ™), AIDS Related Complex (ARC) and AIDS patients should be sure
that they are well-nourished with cysteine, selenium, garlic, vitamin B-12,
folic acid, zinc and Dimethylglycine (DMG). Add Coenzyme Q-10 to this list.
Dr. Karl Folkers and colleagues at the Institute for Biomedical Research
at the University of Texas have expanded on their recent study of ARC patients
who have now lived for over four years with ARC without developing “full-blown”
AIDS by taking 200 milligrams of Coenzyme Q-10 daily. Their first small-scale
study was published in Biochemical and Biophysical Research, and their expanded
study will be published in the Journal of Applied Nutrition. [47]Detoxification



These sulfur-containing nutrients are also gaining new interest because
they protect against toxins. NAC is particularly effective and NAC detoxifies
several toxic agents including the heavy metals such as mercury, lead and
cadmium [48-54], drugs including acetaminophen (e. g. Tylenol ™) [9,55-61],
herbicides such as paraquat [62], environmental pollutants such as carbon
tetrachloride and urethane [63-67], and microorganism including aflatoxin
and Escherichia coli [68-70].



NAC, cysteine and glutathione contain sulfur in the form of sulfhydryl groups.
Sulfhydryl groups directly react with many poisons, especially heavy metals
such as lead, mercury and cadmium. These sulfur-containing nutrients are
the bodies first line of defense against many poisons as they tie-up the
poisons right in the gut. They also offer second-line and third-line defenses
in the liver and various individual cells. Sulfhydryl groups also help remove
toxins indirectly via an enzyme system called the P-450 System.



NAC also has a secondary role in detoxification since it helps produce optimal
amounts of glutathione which also conjugates with most “foreign”
compounds and excess oxidizers that enter cells. The harmful compounds that
have been conjugated with glutathione then pass harmlessly out of the body
through the biliary system. [54]



Although NAC is a food component and a nutrient accessory factor, it is
also marketed as a drug with approved medical claims. Other nutrients also
have dual classifications, but just because a nutrient is also approved
for “drug” usage, its role as a nutrient is not affected unless
drug claims are made. If the nutrient is used to nourish the body, it remains
a nutrient. If the nutrient is used to treat a non-deficiency disease, then
this use changes its legal classification to a drug.



NAC is approved as a drug for use to prevent liver damage from acetaminophen
overdose. Either NAC tablets or solutions may be used to protect against
acetaminophen overdose. Normally, the 20 percent solution is mixed with
a cola drink.



The Lancet reports that NAC is also effective in reducing the toxic
effects of carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and carbon monoxide. [9] NAC
can also reduce the side effects of drugs such as doxorubicin, ifosphamide,
valproic acid and alcohol. [9,60,61]



Cancer

NAC protects against cancer by both of its roles as antioxidant and detoxifier.
[4,70-76]



NAC also reduces the toxic effects of some chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin
and oxazophosporine-based agents. [77,78]



Mucolytic

NAC has been used for about thirty years to break up mucus in persons having
bronchopulmonary diseases including chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis,
asthma, sinusitis and pneumonia. [79] NAC helps reduce the viscosity of
mucus so that it may be more easily coughed up. [80] NAC accomplishes this
by converting the disulfide bonds of the mucoproteins into sulfhydryl bonds
and cleaving the mucoproteins into smaller molecules.



Several companies provide a 10 or 20 percent NAC solution as a nebulizer
spray (such as Bristol Laboratories’ Mucomyst TM), while others such as
Italy’s Zambon group provides NAC in tablet form. When a nutrient is topically
applied or sprayed into the lungs, it can then be classified also as a drug
because it does not then enter into metabolism to nourish the body when
it is administered in this way. (However, this is different from having
a nutrient absorbed into the body by sublingual or nasal membrane
application which allows the nutrient to nourish the body.)



Optimal Intake Ranges

There are a few toxicological studies of NAC available and the following
observations can be made. NAC in normal food supplementation ranges is without
known toxicity and has been administered by physicians under supervision
in doses of 500 milligrams to four grams daily. Daily levels of 1,000 milligrams
of NAC per kilogram in rats for several months did not produce adverse effects
in behavior, weight gain, hematology, liver function and kidney function.
[81] (That’s the equivalent of 60 grams of NAC per day for a 132 pound person,
80 grams per day for a 176 pound person, or 100 grams per day for a 220
pound person.)



When administered via nebulizer, adverse effects can include stomatitis,
nausea and nasal irritation. [42] Intravenous administration could also
produce edema and a rapid heart beat. [9]



Larger quantities used for treating acetaminophen overdoses have produced
adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal symptoms.
[42] Rash, with or without mild fever, has been reported on rare occasions
with very large quantities. intravenous administration of
more than 150 milligrams of NAC per kilogram of body weight within a fifteen
minute period may produce toxic or other undesirable effects. [9]



The mouse LD50 of oral NAC is reported to be about 8,000 milligrams of NAC
per kilogram in the mouse, and 5050 milligrams per kilogram in the rat.
[81,82] For more details on NAC safety, please refer to references 83 through
88.






References




1. Slowing AIDS: The roles of NAC and vitamin C.Passwater, Richard A.Whole
Foods (Jan. 1992)

2. Human Aging Research: Part TwoPasswater, Richard A. and Welker, Paul
A.Amer. Lab. 3(5):21-6 (May 1971)

3. Enhancement of ischaemic rabbit skin flap survival with theantioxidant
and free-radical scavenger N-acetylcysteine.Knight, K., et al,Clin. Sci.
81:31-6 (1991)

4. Antioxidant activity and other mechanisms of thiols involvedin chemoprevention
of mutation and cancer.De Flora, Silvio, et al,Amer. J. Med. 91(Suppl 3C):122S-130S
(Sep. 30, 1991)

5. Bioavailability of dietary glutathione: Effect on plasmaconcentration.Hagen,
Torie M., et al,Amer. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 259(4):22-4(1990)
and Amer. J. Physiol. 259:G524-G529 (1990)

6. Glutathione-mediated transport across intestinal brush-bordermembranes.Vincenzini,
M. T., Favilli, F. and Iantomasi, T.Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Ser. Biomembr.
942(1):107-14 (1988)

7. Glutathione and Aflatoxin B-1 induced liver tumors: Evidencethat the
intact glutathione molecule is required by theneoplastic tissue to undergo
regression of malignancy.Novi, A. M., Florke, R. and Stukenkemper, M.Science
212:541-2 (1981)

8. Exogenous glutathione protects intestinal epithelial cellsfrom oxidative
injury.Lash, Lawrence H., et al,Proceed. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83:4641-5 (1986)

9. AcetylcysteineEditorialThe Lancet 337(8749):1069-70 (May 4, 1991)

10. Systemic glutathione deficiency in symptom-free HIV-seropositive individuals.
Buhl, Roland, et al.,The Lancet 2(8675):1294-8 (Dec. 2, 1989)

11. Glutathione concentrations in plasma and blood are markedlydecreased
in HIV-infected children.Smith, C. V., et al.,Int. Conf. AIDS 6(2):368 (abst.
# 2058) (June 20-3, 1990)

12. Metabolic disorder as early consequence of SimianImmunodeficiency Virus
infection in Rhesus macaques.Eck, Hans-Peter, et al,Lancet 338:346-7 (Aug.
10, 1991)

13. Blood antioxidant status and erythrocyte lipid peroxidationfollowing
distance running.Duthie, G., et al.Arch. Bioch. 282:78-83 (1990)

14. Protective Effect of Vitamin E On Exercise-induced OxidativeDamage in
Young and ELderly Subjects.Meydani, M., et al.International Society for
Free Radical Research, 5th BiennialMtg. Pasadena, CA (Nov. 14-20, 1990)

15. Spintrappers and Vitamin E prolong endurance to musclefatigue in mice.Novelli,
G., et al.Free Rad. Bio. Med. 8:9-13 (1990)

16. Lp(a) lipoprotein as a risk factor for myocardialinfarction.Rhoads,
G. G., et al,JAMA 256:2540-4 (1986)

17. Apolipoprotein(a), A1 and B and parental history in men withearly onset
ischaemic heart disease.Durrington, P. N., et al,Lancet I 1070-3 (1988)

18. Lipoprotein(a) modulation of endothelial cell surfacefibrinolysis and
its potential role in atherosclerosis.Hajjar, K. A., et al,Nature 339:303-5
(1989)

19. Lipoprotein(a)EditorialLancet 337:397-8 (Feb. 16, 1991)20. Lipoprotein(a):
A possible link between lipoproteinmetabolism and thrombosis.Rees, AlanBrit,
Heart J. 65:2-3 (1991)

21. Inverse correlation between plasma vitamin E and mortalityfrom ischemic
heart disease in cross-cultural epidemiology.Gey,, K. Fred, et al,Amer.
J. Clin. Nutr. 53:326S-34S (1991)

22. Lipoprotein(a) reduction by N-acetylcysteine.Gavish, Dov and Breslow,
Jan L.The Lancet 337:203-4 (Jan. 26, 1991)

23. N-acetylcysteine and lipoprotein.Stalenhoef, A. F. H., et al,The Lancet
337:491 (Feb. 23, 1991)

24. N-Acetylcysteine and immunoreactivity of lipoprotein(a).Scanu, Angelo
M.The Lancet 337:1159 (May 4, 1991)

25. Thiols and cysteine-containing compounds attenuate theimmunoreactivity
of Lp(a).Scanu, Angelo M., et al,Arterioscl. Thromb. 11(5):1481a (Sep./Oct.
1991)

26. The role of glutathione status in the protection againstischaemic and
reperfusion damage: Effects ofN-acetylcysteine.Ceconi, C., et al,J. Mol.
Cell Cardiol. 20:5-13 (1988)

27. Beneficial effects of N-acetylcysteine and cysteine instunned myocardium
in perfused rat heart.Tang, L-D., et al,Brit. J. Pharmacol. 102(3):601-6
(1991)

28. Lipoprotein(a) reduction by N-acetylcysteine.Hansen, P. R.Lancet 337:672-3
(1991)

29. Continuous oral N-acetylcysteine treatment and developmentof nitrate
tolerance in patients with stable anginapectoris.Boesgaard, Soren, et al,J.
Cardiovas. Pharmacol. 17(6):889-93 (1991)

30. Mercaptoethanol and N-acetylcysteine enhance T-cell colonyformation
in AIDS and ARC.Wu, J., Levy, E. M. and Black, P. H.Clin. Exp. Immunol.
77:7-10 (1989)

31. Lymphocyte dysfunction after DNA damage by toxic oxygenspecies.Carson,
D. A., Seto, S. and Wasson, D. B.J. Exp. Med. 163:746-51 (1986)

32. Immunomodulation by neutrophil myeloperoxidase and hydrogenperoxide:
Differential susceptibility of human lymphocytefunctions.El-Hag, A., et
al,J. Immunol. 136:3420-6 (1986)

33. Thiol-containing antioxidant drugs and the human immunesystem.Stagnaro,
R., et al,Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. 23:303-7 (1987)

34. Suppression of Cytokine-induced Human Immunodeficiency Virus(HIV) expression
by N-acetylcysteine (NAC), glutathione(GSH) and Glutathione monoester (GSE)Kinter,
Audrey L., et al,75th Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societiesfor
Experimental Biology, Atlanta, Georgia (April 21-5, 1991)J. FASEB 5(5) A1265
(1991)

35. Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus expression inchronically
infected monocytic cells by glutathione,glutathione ester, and N-acetylcysteine.
Kalebic, Thea, et al,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88(3):986-90 (1991)

36. Thiol-based compounds may limit AIDS progression.CDC AIDS Weekly p3
(Feb. 25, 1991)

37. N-acetylcysteine inhibits latent HIV expression inchronically infected
cells.Roederer, M., et al,AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 7(6):563-7 (1991)

38. Cytokine-stimulated human immunodeficiency virus replicationis inhibited
by N-acetylcysteine.Roederer, M., et al,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87:4884-8
(1990)

39. Intercellular thiols regulate activation of nuclear factorkappa B and
transcription of HIV.Staal, F. J., Roederer, M. Herzenberg, L. A. andHerzenberg,
L. A.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87(24):9943-7 (Dec. 1990)

40. Reducing agents and AIDS – Why are we waiting?Turner, V. F.Med. J. Aust.
153/8, 502 (1990)

41. Mercaptoethanol and N-acetylcysteine enhance T-cell colonyformation
in AIDS and ARC. Wu, J., et al,Clin. Exp. Immunol. 77/1, 7-10 (1989)

42. AIDS – Drug therapy; Acetylcysteine research.Cooper, MikeCDC AIDS Weekly
p4 (Oct. 2, 1989)

43. Glutathione deficiency and radiosensitivity in AIDSpatients.Vallis,
K. A.The Lancet 337:918-9 (April 13, 1991)

44. Comparative study of the anti-HIV activities of ascorbateand thiol-containing
reducing agents in chronicallyHIV-infected cells.Harakeh, Steve and Jariwalla,
Raxit J.Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 54:1231S-5S (1991)

45. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication and NF-kappa B activity bycysteine and
cysteine derivatives.Mihm, S., et al,AIDS 5(5):497-503 (May 1991)

46. Intracellular glutathione level controls DNA-bindingactivity of NF kappa
B-like proteins. Mihm, S. and Droge, W.Int. Conf. AIDS 6(3):159 (abst. #
SA311) (June 20-3, 1990)

47. Coenzyme Q10 increases T4/T8 ratios of lymphocytes inordinary subjects
and relevance to patients having the AIDSrelated complex. Folkers, Karl,
et al,Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 176(2):786-91 (April 30, 1991)

48. Clinical application for heavy metal-complexing potential ofN-acetylcysteine.Lorber,
A., et al,J. Clin. Pharmacol. 13:332-6 (1973)

49. N-acetylcysteine therapy of acute heavy metal poisoning inmice.Henderson,
P., et al,Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 27:522-5 (1985)

50. Treatment of acute methylmercury ingestion byhemodialysis with N-acetylcysteine.Lund,
M. E., Clarkson, T. W. and Berlin, M.J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 22:31-49
(1984)

51. Lung and blood superoxide dismutase activity in mercuryvapor exposed
rats.Livardjani, F. et al,Toxicol. 66(3):289-95 (1991)

52. Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in protecting againstmercuric chloride-induced
nephrotoxicity.Girardi, G. and Elias M. M.Toxicol. 67(2):155-64 (1991)

53. Experimental chelation therapy in chromium, lead and boronintoxification
with N-acetylcysteine.Tong, T. G.Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 83:142-7 (1986)

54. The role of glutathione in detoxification.Ketterer, B., Coles, B. and
Meyer, D. JEnvir. Health Perspec. 49:59-69 (1983)

55. Mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine in the protectionagainst hepatotoxicity
of acetaminophen in rats in vivo.Lauterburg, B. H., Corcoran, G. B. and
Mitchell, J. R.J. Clin. Invest. 71:980-991 (1983)

56. Role of glutathione in prevention of acetaminophen-inducedhepatotoxicity
by N-acetyl-L-cysteine in vivo.Corcoran, G. B. and Wong, B. K.J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 238:54-61 (1986)

57. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on plasma cysteine andglutathione following
paracetamol administration.Burgunder, J. M., Varriale, A. and Lauterberg,
B. H.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 36:127-31 (1989)

58. The disposition and kinetics of intravenousN-acetylcysteine in patients
with paracetamol overdosage.Prescott, L. F., et al,Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
37:501-6 (1989)

59. Improvement by acetylcysteine of hemodynamics and oxygentransport in
fulminant hepatic failure.Harrison, Phillip M., et al,N. Engl. J. Med. 324(26):1852-7
(June 27, 1991)

60. Identification and characterization of the glutathione andN-acetylcysteine
conjugates of E-2, Propyl-2,4-pentadienoicacid (a toxic metabolite of valproic
acid in rats andhumans.Kassahun, K. Farrell, K. and Abbott, F.Drug Metab.
Dispos. 19(2):525-35 (1991)

61. N-acetylcysteine: Protective agent or promoter of gastricdamage?Lopez,
R. A., et al,PSKBM 197:273-8 (1991)

62. N-acetylcysteine improves the survival rate of paraquatpoisoned rats:
Elucidation of its mode of action.Hoffer, E., et al,Rev. Respir. Dis. 143(4
part 2) A731 (1991)

63. Allopurinol/N-acetylcysteine for carbon monoxide poisoning.Howard, R.
J. M. W., et al,Lancet II 628-9 (1987)

64. Acute carbon tetrachloride poisoning in 19 patients:Implications for
diagnosis and treatment.Ruprah, M., Mant, T. G. and Flanagan, R. J.Lancet
I 1027-9 (1985)

65. Survival after iassive ingestion of carbon tetrachloridetreated by intravenous
infusion of acetylcysteine.Mathieson, P. W., Williams, G. and MacSweeney,
J. E.Hum. Toxicol. 4(6):627-31 (1985)

66. Inhibition of urethane-induced lung tumors in mice bydietary N-acetylcysteine.De
Flora, Silvio, et al,Cancer Lett. 32(3):235-41 (1986)

67. Identification of N-acetyl-S-(N-methylcarbamoyl)cysteine:A human metabolite
of N,N-dimethylformamide andN-methylformamide.Mraz, J. and Turecek, F.J.
Chromatogr. 414(2)399-404 (1987)

68. N-acetylcysteine prevents diaphragmatic contractilealterations induced
by Escherichia-coli endotoxemiain rats.Du, Y., Boczkowski, J. and Aubier,
M.Rev. Respir. Dis. 143 (4 part 2) A560 (1991)

69. Urinary excretion of thiol conjugates of aflatoxin B1 inrats and hamsters.Raj,
H. G. and Lotlikar, P. D.Cancer Lett. 22(2):125-33 (1984)

70. Modifying role of dietary factors on the mutagenicity ofaflatoxin B1:
In vitro effect of sulfur-containing aminoacids.Shetty, T. K., Francis,
A. R. and Bhattacharya, R. K.Mutat. Res. 222(4):403-7 (1989)

71. Metabolic, desmutagenic and anticarcinogenic effects ofN-acetylcysteine.De
Flora, Silvio, Rossi, G. A. and De Flora, A.Respiration 30(suppl. 1):43-9
(1986)

72. In vitro effects of N-acetylcysteine on the mutagenicity ofdirect-acting
compounds and procarcinogens.De Flora, Silvio, et al,Carcinogenesis 5(4):505-10
(1984)

73. In vivo effects of N-acetylcysteine on glutathionemetabolism and on
the biotransformation of carcinogenicand/or mutagenic compounds.De Flora,
Silvio, et alCarcinogenesis 6(12):1735-45 (1985)

74. Detoxification of genotoxic compounds as a thresholdmechanism limiting
their carcinogenicity.De Flora, S.Toxicol. Pathol. 12(4):337-43 (1984)

75. Effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine and ascorbic acid onmutagen-induced chromosomal
sensitivity in patients withhead and neck cancers.Trazana, Zoltan, et al,Amer.
J. Surg. 162:294-8 (1991)

76. Effect of exogenous glutathione on tumor progression in themurine skin
multistage carcinogenesis model.Rotstein, J. B. and Slaga, T. J.

77. Second-line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.Andersen, M., Kristjansen,
P. E. G. and Hansen, H. H.Cancer Treat. Rev. 17(4):427-36 (1990)

78. N-acetylcysteine as chemoprotectant in cancer chemotherapy.Martinez,
Esteban and Domingo, PereLancet 338:249 (July 27, 1991)

79. Long-term oral acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis: Adouble-blind controlled
study.Multicenter Study GroupEur. J. Respir. Dis. 61(Sup.):93 (1980)

80. The reduction in vitro in viscosity of mucoproteinsolutions by a new
mucolytic agent, N-acetylcysteine.Sheffner, A. L.Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 106:288
(1963)

81. Toxicological, pharmacokinetics and metabolic studies onacetylcysteine.Bonanomi,
L. and Gazzaniga, A.Eur. J. Respir. Dis. 61(Sup):45-51 (1980)

82. AcetylcysteineMerck Index

83. Pharmokinetics of oral acetylcysteine.Rodenstein, D., DeCoster, A. and
Gazzaniga, A.Clin. Pharmacokin. 3:247-54 (1978)

84. Clinical pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine.Borgstrom, L., Kagedal,
B. and Paulsen, O.Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 31:217-22 (1986)

85. Pharmokinetics and bioavailability of reduced and oxidizedN-acetylcysteine.Olsson,
B., et al,Eur. J. Clin. Pharmocol. 34:77-82 (1988)

86. Acetylcysteine: A drug that is much more than a mucokinetic.Ziment,
I.Biomed. Pharmacother. 42:513-20 (1988)

87. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral acetylcysteinein healthy
volunteers.De Caro, L., et al,Arzneim.-Forsch/Drug Res., 39:382 (1989)

88. Clinical pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine.Holdiness, M. R.Clin.
Pharmacokinet. 20:123-34 (1991)



All rights, including electronic and print media, to this article are copyrighted
by Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D. and Whole Foods magazine (WFC Inc.).


]]>
21697